Skip to main content

Dennis Ritchie

No, this blog is not meant as an obituary blog. However, this is one post that I have to write. Since the death of Steve Jobs, the computing world has lost another influential personality. Dennis Ritchie, the creator of the C programming language. Yes, the same C programming language that is used to program almost all electronic devices with a microprocessor. The very same. Does this code look familiar?


/*My first C program*/
#include <stdio.h>

int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
    printf("Hello World!");
    return 0;
}

Ritchie's contributions go far beyond the C language. He contributed greatly to the development of UNIX, one of the world's first operating systems. You may not be aware of it, but UNIX defined many of the parameters on which today's operating systems are based upon. Linux is a UNIX clone, which means that it behaves in the same way as UNIX. Macintosh, which Steve Jobs is known for, is nothing but a UNIX derivative. I wonder what Jobs may have done in the absence of C? Erm, wrong question, it should have read: How would Jobs have piggybacked on the Other Steve's technical skills, if it were not for C or UNIX?

Yet, the person who actually drove the change that we see today in computing has created the slightest ripple over the internet. It cannot ever compare with the massive hysteria over the death of Steve Jobs, who, as Richard Stallman puts it, made jail seem cool. I'm don't quite agree with what Stallman says, but then, I don't agree with what Jobs did either.

As I write this post, the irony is hard to miss. The person who really changed computing has left this world. Along with him, someone who wore turtle-necks too died. Yet, the world went hysterical over the one who hogged the limelight, and one died a relatively nondescript death.

Does this code look familiar?


/*Dennis Ritchie*/
#include <stdio.h>

int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
    printf("Goodbye World!");
    return 0;
}

Comments

  1. It's a pity that Steve Jobs who probably designed only the most superficial aspects of Apple products (i.e. user interface and looks) gets more attention in the public.
    Whatever is happening inside each of the billions of modern gadgets is beyond breathtaking at so many levels.. right from complicated algorithms coded into operating systems; down to the countless transistors that are really doing the work. Steve Jobs owes to Dennis Ritchie and countless others.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ERROR_SUCCESS

ERROR_SUCCESS. This macro would be familiar to all those who have done some programming in WIN32. It is the output of the GetLastError() function to check the thread's last error state when no error has occurred. Weird, isn't it? I mean, if it is a success, then why is it marked as an error in the macro? This is one example of a badly made API. APIs are considered bad when programming in them becomes non-intuitive. Software is said to be bad (or said to suck) when it seems counter-intuitive to the user. There is one very simple example of this. Start notepad. Type in any text. Click on close. The message that you see is: This makes no sense to me as a user. Of course, the programmer follows the approach that he creates a temporary file called Untitled , and in that file he allows the user to make all his changes. But how am I, as a user to understand that? A similar disconnect occurs even between two different programmers. That is why it takes a whole lot of effort to make

On Harry Potter and why I dislike the series

There could not be a better time for this post. There could not have been a worse time for this post. Now that the penultimate movie of the series is out, and my facebook wall filled with people who loved the movie. But this is something I really wanted to say, and I shall say it anyway. Harry Potter is pathetic literature. Now, you must be wondering why I say that. There are many reasons. Firstly, the storyline itself is flawed. When a writer sits down to write anything, he/she must set up some essential rules about what is happening. These rules must remain constant irrespective of how many times he/she changes his/her mind. This is so that the readers are allowed to have some sensibility in what they are reading. In the fourth book, Rowling goes ahead and kills Cedric. Then, at the end of the book, the horseless carriages are there again. Nothing special. We all knew that they are horseless. But then comes the fifth book, and BAM, the horses are actually winged beasts that only thos

Elements of a Story: The Whispers

I'm compelled to begin each post with a meta. That way, my blog posts seem less like essays or dissertations, and more like diary entries, or web logs. So here goes... I started this blog a little over a year ago. The main purpose of this blog was to experiment with styles of writing, and find an effective outlet for all the subjects I wish to rant about; saving my classmates the agony of having to listen to them. As I wrote this blog, I've experimented with so many styles, and have received comments claiming that my work is a shameless copy greatly inspired by so-and-so author/work. Fact is that I simply chanced upon that style. I read, so obviously, my work shall reflect the styles of those I admire, but I've worked out so many styles without even knowing that they exist, only to be informed of them later. Recently, I've been struck with the seeming absence of whispers as an element of a story. The more I've thought of the subject, the more I've been convince