Skip to main content

Integrated with Google+

Google is aggressively promoting Plus. This means that all services are now going to be integrated with Plus. Picasa Web Albums exist, but are no longer the default photo management service. Instead, clicking on photos links me to the pictures from my circles on Plus. Reader is soon to go, and be merged with Plus. Buzz is to go, and Blogger too has been integrated with Plus.

The networking aspect is the goose (that lays the golden egg) of the day. Whether or not Google wants to take on Facebook, Plus looks like it's here to stay. Why should it not? Google has learnt its lessons from the Buzz fiasco, and have the USP that relations in real life are much more complex than the friend/not friend status that others offer. In fact, I think that Plus is closer to Twitter than it is to Facebook, but without the character limit, with the option to comment on posts, something I enjoy. The ability to follow random people with interesting posts and engage with them in a meaningful way changes the way I have viewed networks. It's a new concept to a person who has so far thought of networking as Facebook or LinkedIn. Suddenly, the knowing barrier has been removed, it is no longer important to know a person to engage with him/her. The importance of breaking this barrier has been recognized by Facebook, and suddenly, it too has come up with an option to subscribe to a person's posts.

The secret to a good Plus experience is to create meaningful circles. It's no use adding everyone to the friends circle, if that was the case, you'd be better off with Facebook. If you think it's difficult to classify a person, just add them to the following circle, it means that you are just following them. Once you begin following a certain number of people, patterns will emerge, and you can then try to classify people. For me, I'm interested in photography and graphics design. So, I create a circle with the title Photographers I follow. With interactions on posts by these photographers, I discover a whole range of people who are amateurs like me (but whose photographs have a much better quality). For such people, I created another circle Random people interested in photography. Since some of them were also graphics designers, I could then create another circle with the title Graphics designers I follow. Get the drift?

The ability to effectively group people is the essence of Plus. As Prashant remarked in one of his posts, it is entirely possible to create a circle so that you get only good posts. Probably because there are a whole group of professionals out there who actively use Plus to promote their trade. For many, it's like an alternate blogging platform, so many cross post their blogs on Plus.

Sparks is another useful service on Plus. Add your interests to sparks, and get good volume of high quality content on that interest. You may even find interesting people to follow.

One of the issues with integrating all Google services with Plus however, is that Plus so far has many wrinkles, which need to be ironed out. For example, photographs in Plus do not include licensing information, which was displayed in Picasa Web. At the same time, I'm not aware of any method to +1 any one picture from an album. Similarly, Google uses comments to mark stories as top stories, so posts with a high volume of comments can easily occlude newer posts which have a lower volume of comments. Frankly, I think this is stupid, as anyone would logically stop looking for posts once he reaches posts he has seen before.



Some tips to improve your experience on Plus. Exercise caution with mutual circling, i.e. don't circle someone just because they have circled you. You are under no obligation to do so. Look at their public posts, read the about me section, then add them, if you find their content interesting. There is no use adding people who just reshare a particular person's work. However, there may be some who reshare a well edited bouquet of posts on topics that you may find interesting. If so, don't hesitate to circle them, hey, after all, high quality content is all that matters. Report spam, or abuse. Remember, Google does not allow nudity, obscenity, violence, hatred etc. in posts on Plus. Report them. Improve the experience for others.

Now, just try to apply the same logic to your contribution on Plus. Have a good profile, describing yourself, add a good profile picture (of yourself, why hide your face), as a picture is the first thing someone would notice (after all, we recognize people with their faces). Have a moderate amount of content, and make sure that some of it is public, for the benefit of those who may not be in your circles. Limit private posts to private circles, but it's fun to engage with people you don't know, to provide them with content. If you are the reticent kind (like I am), try and get over the barrier, but exercise caution. Do not make public the posts that reveal too much information about yourself, or any private content. Also, pay attention to the circles you share content with when you post. By default, the post is shared with those with whom you shared last with. If you forget this, you might just make one of the biggest reply-all gaffes in history (wink).

So, welcome to Plus. If you are a Google user, chances are that you have already been included in the Plus community. Enjoy the Plus experience.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Harry Potter and why I dislike the series

There could not be a better time for this post. There could not have been a worse time for this post. Now that the penultimate movie of the series is out, and my facebook wall filled with people who loved the movie. But this is something I really wanted to say, and I shall say it anyway. Harry Potter is pathetic literature. Now, you must be wondering why I say that. There are many reasons. Firstly, the storyline itself is flawed. When a writer sits down to write anything, he/she must set up some essential rules about what is happening. These rules must remain constant irrespective of how many times he/she changes his/her mind. This is so that the readers are allowed to have some sensibility in what they are reading. In the fourth book, Rowling goes ahead and kills Cedric. Then, at the end of the book, the horseless carriages are there again. Nothing special. We all knew that they are horseless. But then comes the fifth book, and BAM, the horses are actually winged beasts that only thos

ERROR_SUCCESS

ERROR_SUCCESS. This macro would be familiar to all those who have done some programming in WIN32. It is the output of the GetLastError() function to check the thread's last error state when no error has occurred. Weird, isn't it? I mean, if it is a success, then why is it marked as an error in the macro? This is one example of a badly made API. APIs are considered bad when programming in them becomes non-intuitive. Software is said to be bad (or said to suck) when it seems counter-intuitive to the user. There is one very simple example of this. Start notepad. Type in any text. Click on close. The message that you see is: This makes no sense to me as a user. Of course, the programmer follows the approach that he creates a temporary file called Untitled , and in that file he allows the user to make all his changes. But how am I, as a user to understand that? A similar disconnect occurs even between two different programmers. That is why it takes a whole lot of effort to make

Elements of a Story: The Whispers

I'm compelled to begin each post with a meta. That way, my blog posts seem less like essays or dissertations, and more like diary entries, or web logs. So here goes... I started this blog a little over a year ago. The main purpose of this blog was to experiment with styles of writing, and find an effective outlet for all the subjects I wish to rant about; saving my classmates the agony of having to listen to them. As I wrote this blog, I've experimented with so many styles, and have received comments claiming that my work is a shameless copy greatly inspired by so-and-so author/work. Fact is that I simply chanced upon that style. I read, so obviously, my work shall reflect the styles of those I admire, but I've worked out so many styles without even knowing that they exist, only to be informed of them later. Recently, I've been struck with the seeming absence of whispers as an element of a story. The more I've thought of the subject, the more I've been convince