Skip to main content

Integrated with Google+

Google is aggressively promoting Plus. This means that all services are now going to be integrated with Plus. Picasa Web Albums exist, but are no longer the default photo management service. Instead, clicking on photos links me to the pictures from my circles on Plus. Reader is soon to go, and be merged with Plus. Buzz is to go, and Blogger too has been integrated with Plus.

The networking aspect is the goose (that lays the golden egg) of the day. Whether or not Google wants to take on Facebook, Plus looks like it's here to stay. Why should it not? Google has learnt its lessons from the Buzz fiasco, and have the USP that relations in real life are much more complex than the friend/not friend status that others offer. In fact, I think that Plus is closer to Twitter than it is to Facebook, but without the character limit, with the option to comment on posts, something I enjoy. The ability to follow random people with interesting posts and engage with them in a meaningful way changes the way I have viewed networks. It's a new concept to a person who has so far thought of networking as Facebook or LinkedIn. Suddenly, the knowing barrier has been removed, it is no longer important to know a person to engage with him/her. The importance of breaking this barrier has been recognized by Facebook, and suddenly, it too has come up with an option to subscribe to a person's posts.

The secret to a good Plus experience is to create meaningful circles. It's no use adding everyone to the friends circle, if that was the case, you'd be better off with Facebook. If you think it's difficult to classify a person, just add them to the following circle, it means that you are just following them. Once you begin following a certain number of people, patterns will emerge, and you can then try to classify people. For me, I'm interested in photography and graphics design. So, I create a circle with the title Photographers I follow. With interactions on posts by these photographers, I discover a whole range of people who are amateurs like me (but whose photographs have a much better quality). For such people, I created another circle Random people interested in photography. Since some of them were also graphics designers, I could then create another circle with the title Graphics designers I follow. Get the drift?

The ability to effectively group people is the essence of Plus. As Prashant remarked in one of his posts, it is entirely possible to create a circle so that you get only good posts. Probably because there are a whole group of professionals out there who actively use Plus to promote their trade. For many, it's like an alternate blogging platform, so many cross post their blogs on Plus.

Sparks is another useful service on Plus. Add your interests to sparks, and get good volume of high quality content on that interest. You may even find interesting people to follow.

One of the issues with integrating all Google services with Plus however, is that Plus so far has many wrinkles, which need to be ironed out. For example, photographs in Plus do not include licensing information, which was displayed in Picasa Web. At the same time, I'm not aware of any method to +1 any one picture from an album. Similarly, Google uses comments to mark stories as top stories, so posts with a high volume of comments can easily occlude newer posts which have a lower volume of comments. Frankly, I think this is stupid, as anyone would logically stop looking for posts once he reaches posts he has seen before.



Some tips to improve your experience on Plus. Exercise caution with mutual circling, i.e. don't circle someone just because they have circled you. You are under no obligation to do so. Look at their public posts, read the about me section, then add them, if you find their content interesting. There is no use adding people who just reshare a particular person's work. However, there may be some who reshare a well edited bouquet of posts on topics that you may find interesting. If so, don't hesitate to circle them, hey, after all, high quality content is all that matters. Report spam, or abuse. Remember, Google does not allow nudity, obscenity, violence, hatred etc. in posts on Plus. Report them. Improve the experience for others.

Now, just try to apply the same logic to your contribution on Plus. Have a good profile, describing yourself, add a good profile picture (of yourself, why hide your face), as a picture is the first thing someone would notice (after all, we recognize people with their faces). Have a moderate amount of content, and make sure that some of it is public, for the benefit of those who may not be in your circles. Limit private posts to private circles, but it's fun to engage with people you don't know, to provide them with content. If you are the reticent kind (like I am), try and get over the barrier, but exercise caution. Do not make public the posts that reveal too much information about yourself, or any private content. Also, pay attention to the circles you share content with when you post. By default, the post is shared with those with whom you shared last with. If you forget this, you might just make one of the biggest reply-all gaffes in history (wink).

So, welcome to Plus. If you are a Google user, chances are that you have already been included in the Plus community. Enjoy the Plus experience.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Harry Potter and why I dislike the series

There could not be a better time for this post. There could not have been a worse time for this post. Now that the penultimate movie of the series is out, and my facebook wall filled with people who loved the movie. But this is something I really wanted to say, and I shall say it anyway. Harry Potter is pathetic literature. Now, you must be wondering why I say that. There are many reasons. Firstly, the storyline itself is flawed. When a writer sits down to write anything, he/she must set up some essential rules about what is happening. These rules must remain constant irrespective of how many times he/she changes his/her mind. This is so that the readers are allowed to have some sensibility in what they are reading. In the fourth book, Rowling goes ahead and kills Cedric. Then, at the end of the book, the horseless carriages are there again. Nothing special. We all knew that they are horseless. But then comes the fifth book, and BAM, the horses are actually winged beasts that only thos...
18 comments
Read more

On the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard

This is a post that I have been meaning to write from quite some time. Long hours spent typing code on my computer left my hands fatigued, and left me with a lot of pain in my wrists and fingers. That is when I decided to use the Dvorak. But I have got the same bad habit as Dr. Watson, to tell a story backwards. Of course, you must be wondering what the Dvorak is. The story of keyboards starts with the invention of the typewriter. Christopher Sholes, the inventor of the typewriter, tried with a two row piano style keyboard. But then, he got into many difficulties with the design. Then he finally settled for a four row design. This was similar to the QWERTY layout that most computers and typewriters today possess. The engineers at Remington, to whom Sholes had presented his design modified the layout a little further, and then the QWERTY was born. As typewriters became popular, people got used to the layout, and started practising touch typing, i.e. typing without looking at the keys...
Post a Comment
Read more

The paradox of government

I'm fascinated by the concept of government, and the paradoxes it presents. On one hand, governments grant us a certain set of rights or liberties. On the other hand, they work to strip us of the very liberties they promise. Now, I don't mean that all governments strip people of liberties, but there are liberal regimes, and there are sufficiently restrictive and dictatorial ones. Both models may have results to show, it does not mean that people in a restrictive regime are unhappy (refer to Dan Dennett's TED talk , where he states that ideas or memes can be dangerous when taken from one part of the world, where they are widespread, and, using the virus analogy, where people are immune to the memes; to a part of the world where they are foreign, where people may not be immune to the memes and where people may get infected). History has shown that people were sufficiently satisfied with autocratic governments with a benevolent dictator, and that people in other parts of the ...
Post a Comment
Read more