Skip to main content

Dennis Ritchie

No, this blog is not meant as an obituary blog. However, this is one post that I have to write. Since the death of Steve Jobs, the computing world has lost another influential personality. Dennis Ritchie, the creator of the C programming language. Yes, the same C programming language that is used to program almost all electronic devices with a microprocessor. The very same. Does this code look familiar?


/*My first C program*/
#include <stdio.h>

int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
    printf("Hello World!");
    return 0;
}

Ritchie's contributions go far beyond the C language. He contributed greatly to the development of UNIX, one of the world's first operating systems. You may not be aware of it, but UNIX defined many of the parameters on which today's operating systems are based upon. Linux is a UNIX clone, which means that it behaves in the same way as UNIX. Macintosh, which Steve Jobs is known for, is nothing but a UNIX derivative. I wonder what Jobs may have done in the absence of C? Erm, wrong question, it should have read: How would Jobs have piggybacked on the Other Steve's technical skills, if it were not for C or UNIX?

Yet, the person who actually drove the change that we see today in computing has created the slightest ripple over the internet. It cannot ever compare with the massive hysteria over the death of Steve Jobs, who, as Richard Stallman puts it, made jail seem cool. I'm don't quite agree with what Stallman says, but then, I don't agree with what Jobs did either.

As I write this post, the irony is hard to miss. The person who really changed computing has left this world. Along with him, someone who wore turtle-necks too died. Yet, the world went hysterical over the one who hogged the limelight, and one died a relatively nondescript death.

Does this code look familiar?


/*Dennis Ritchie*/
#include <stdio.h>

int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
    printf("Goodbye World!");
    return 0;
}

Comments

  1. It's a pity that Steve Jobs who probably designed only the most superficial aspects of Apple products (i.e. user interface and looks) gets more attention in the public.
    Whatever is happening inside each of the billions of modern gadgets is beyond breathtaking at so many levels.. right from complicated algorithms coded into operating systems; down to the countless transistors that are really doing the work. Steve Jobs owes to Dennis Ritchie and countless others.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Harry Potter and why I dislike the series

There could not be a better time for this post. There could not have been a worse time for this post. Now that the penultimate movie of the series is out, and my facebook wall filled with people who loved the movie. But this is something I really wanted to say, and I shall say it anyway. Harry Potter is pathetic literature. Now, you must be wondering why I say that. There are many reasons. Firstly, the storyline itself is flawed. When a writer sits down to write anything, he/she must set up some essential rules about what is happening. These rules must remain constant irrespective of how many times he/she changes his/her mind. This is so that the readers are allowed to have some sensibility in what they are reading. In the fourth book, Rowling goes ahead and kills Cedric. Then, at the end of the book, the horseless carriages are there again. Nothing special. We all knew that they are horseless. But then comes the fifth book, and BAM, the horses are actually winged beasts that only thos...

On the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard

This is a post that I have been meaning to write from quite some time. Long hours spent typing code on my computer left my hands fatigued, and left me with a lot of pain in my wrists and fingers. That is when I decided to use the Dvorak. But I have got the same bad habit as Dr. Watson, to tell a story backwards. Of course, you must be wondering what the Dvorak is. The story of keyboards starts with the invention of the typewriter. Christopher Sholes, the inventor of the typewriter, tried with a two row piano style keyboard. But then, he got into many difficulties with the design. Then he finally settled for a four row design. This was similar to the QWERTY layout that most computers and typewriters today possess. The engineers at Remington, to whom Sholes had presented his design modified the layout a little further, and then the QWERTY was born. As typewriters became popular, people got used to the layout, and started practising touch typing, i.e. typing without looking at the keys...

The paradox of government

I'm fascinated by the concept of government, and the paradoxes it presents. On one hand, governments grant us a certain set of rights or liberties. On the other hand, they work to strip us of the very liberties they promise. Now, I don't mean that all governments strip people of liberties, but there are liberal regimes, and there are sufficiently restrictive and dictatorial ones. Both models may have results to show, it does not mean that people in a restrictive regime are unhappy (refer to Dan Dennett's TED talk , where he states that ideas or memes can be dangerous when taken from one part of the world, where they are widespread, and, using the virus analogy, where people are immune to the memes; to a part of the world where they are foreign, where people may not be immune to the memes and where people may get infected). History has shown that people were sufficiently satisfied with autocratic governments with a benevolent dictator, and that people in other parts of the ...