Some changes in the design of this blog

Since I started this blog, I have been looking for ways to make it more appealing. Though I always claim that this blog is just an outlet for the many thoughts that pass through my (relatively empty) brain through the day, there is no denying that I do get a lot of pleasure looking at the number of people who visit my blog.

So, I try to put in a new post the moment I see my page-views falling. Also, I put the blog on Facebook and Buzz, forcing it upon my friends(who, by the way make up 95% of my blog's viewers). And I look for ways that the random people who visit my blog by accident share the blog with their friends. Hence, I added the buttons for easy sharing of the blog contents to my blog.

But as luck would have it, my blog's page-views did not go up appreciably. Instead of accepting the fact that I write rather poorly, I decided to blame the poor visibility of the default quick-share buttons. I asked a few people (those who hardly look at my blog) whether they could see the quick-share buttons or not. The answer was that the buttons were hardly visible. (That the content of the blog was not visible either is a different matter:)

So, the solution: To add share buttons on my own, and I decide their shape and size. I hope that these are visible to people. The drawback: They show the number of people who shared/liked the post. That number sure is going to be zero anyway.

Go on, be mean, do not share my posts.

Comments

On Harry Potter and why I dislike the series

There could not be a better time for this post. There could not have been a worse time for this post. Now that the penultimate movie of the series is out, and my facebook wall filled with people who loved the movie. But this is something I really wanted to say, and I shall say it anyway. Harry Potter is pathetic literature. Now, you must be wondering why I say that. There are many reasons. Firstly, the storyline itself is flawed. When a writer sits down to write anything, he/she must set up some essential rules about what is happening. These rules must remain constant irrespective of how many times he/she changes his/her mind. This is so that the readers are allowed to have some sensibility in what they are reading. In the fourth book, Rowling goes ahead and kills Cedric. Then, at the end of the book, the horseless carriages are there again. Nothing special. We all knew that they are horseless. But then comes the fifth book, and BAM, the horses are actually winged beasts that only thos...

On the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard

This is a post that I have been meaning to write from quite some time. Long hours spent typing code on my computer left my hands fatigued, and left me with a lot of pain in my wrists and fingers. That is when I decided to use the Dvorak. But I have got the same bad habit as Dr. Watson, to tell a story backwards. Of course, you must be wondering what the Dvorak is. The story of keyboards starts with the invention of the typewriter. Christopher Sholes, the inventor of the typewriter, tried with a two row piano style keyboard. But then, he got into many difficulties with the design. Then he finally settled for a four row design. This was similar to the QWERTY layout that most computers and typewriters today possess. The engineers at Remington, to whom Sholes had presented his design modified the layout a little further, and then the QWERTY was born. As typewriters became popular, people got used to the layout, and started practising touch typing, i.e. typing without looking at the keys...

The paradox of government

I'm fascinated by the concept of government, and the paradoxes it presents. On one hand, governments grant us a certain set of rights or liberties. On the other hand, they work to strip us of the very liberties they promise. Now, I don't mean that all governments strip people of liberties, but there are liberal regimes, and there are sufficiently restrictive and dictatorial ones. Both models may have results to show, it does not mean that people in a restrictive regime are unhappy (refer to Dan Dennett's TED talk , where he states that ideas or memes can be dangerous when taken from one part of the world, where they are widespread, and, using the virus analogy, where people are immune to the memes; to a part of the world where they are foreign, where people may not be immune to the memes and where people may get infected). History has shown that people were sufficiently satisfied with autocratic governments with a benevolent dictator, and that people in other parts of the ...

Just another blog!

Search This Blog