Skip to main content

On why geeks dislike IE

You hear this everytime. Everyone who is uses the internet often has his own favourite browser. And geeks have all kinds of favourites, text editors, OS, desktop environment, et cetera. But more about that later.

I am narrating a story of arch-enemies that started around 1998. Microsoft bundled its crappy web browser with its relatively good OS. That meant that everyone who used the OS because it was good now used the crappy browser as well. This skewed all stats about browser usage. Suddenly, IE was the most used browser of them all.

One of the prerequisites of being a geek is that you need to be prepared to kill the person who criticizes your favourite (that you are not able to do the same is another story!). So, naturally, the enmity began.

Well, was IE all that bad? I don't think so. It was good to have a browser built into the OS. Moreover, IE innovated and is responsible for so many of the things that make up today's web, and which we take for granted. It was the first browser to implement Cascaded Style Sheets(CSS) that is such an important part of most websites today. It brought in dynamic HTML, Java applets, and AJAX. In short, all the expertise of the people who came up with the most used OS in the world was put in web browser development. In contrast, Netscape, which was the only competitor, would crash the moment it encountered CSS. But what went wrong?

I think the answer would be MS's complacency. When they bundled IE with Windows, they got close to 95% of the market share. Then they stopped innovating. For five years between IE6 and IE7, they did nothing! Then came Firefox, and people started switching left, right and centre.

The advent of Firefox meant another problem. Spurred on by their monopoly, MS had incorporated in IE, many specific features which did not conform with standards. Then suddenly, Firefox was there, following the standards exactly, and web developers were in a lot of trouble.

And many of the security and other bugs were left unattended, which meant that a simple script would crash the browser
<script> for(x in document.write){document.write(x);}</script>

IE7, which came out in 2006, it was way behind competition. Indeed, it barely had support for tabbed browsing, something which Firefox and Opera had from ages. And I have IE8, and still do not use it. Why? Because it fails in acid test 1 itself. In acid test 2, it passes, and in acid test 3, scores a mere 20/100, a massive fail. But these are geek stats. Let me put it in a more layman-ish manner. If I make a website, IE8 will not be able to display the website correctly, even if the website conforms to W3C rules. Take the example of my website. I spent days making it, tweaking the CSS till it looked perfect, cross checking with the W3C validator, to make sure that my website complied with standards, and even made the HTML5 version. Then I tried previewing it on various browsers. Firefox and Safari could not render the HTML5 version properly, but displayed the XHTML version correctly. Google Chrome could render both the HTML5 version and the XHTML version properly. Then I go into IE8. Surprise! My picture vanished, and I was left with the horrible looking "my pic" alternate text. Needless to say, my website looked woefully incomplete, and I had the feeling that I was viewing a page in lynx. Not only that, the browser was way too slow, and frankly, was pathetic. That was it! I would not touch IE with a twenty-foot pole now.

People are saying that IE9 is a good browser, and would give Chrome and Firefox a run for their money, and for the sake of a better web, I hope it is true. Microsoft claims that this browser shall change the world, I hope it does. It shall be a better web indeed, when MS too shall follow standards, and not hold the web back with their sickly nonconforming browsers.

Popular posts from this blog

Progressive Snapshot: Is it worth it?

I turned 25 last year, which in the highly mathematical and calculating eyes of the US insurance industry meant that I had suddenly matured into a much more responsible driver than I was at 24 years and 364 days of age. As a result, I expected my insurance rates to go down. Imagine my surprise when my insurance renewal notice from GEICO actually quoted a $50 increase in my insurance rates. To me, this was a clear signal that it was time to switch companies.Typically, I score really high on brand loyalty. I tend to stick with a brand for as long as possible, unless they really mess up. This qualified as a major mess up. As a result, I started shopping for insurance quotes.Two companies that quoted me significantly lower rates (30%–40% lower) were Progressive and Allstate. Both had an optional programme that could give me further discounts based on my consenting to the companies tracking my driving habits. Now, I am a careful driver – I hardly ever accelerate hard. I hate using the brak…

Build those noise cancelling headphones

So, here's another DIYLet me start by putting the cart before the horse. I shall start with the credits. This project was done while I was working on my Electronics Design Lab, along with my friends, Srujan M and Indrasen Bhattacharya. The work would not have been possible without the generous help received from the staff at Wadhwani Electronics Laboratory, who ensured that the only thing we did right was to leave the lab on time. This project would also not have been possible without the guidance of our dear and learned professors. It would probably have just about become additional dead weight on the head.Enough with the credits, now, I need to dive right into noise cancellation and how it works.The essence of sound is a pressure wave. The pressure wave, when incident on the eardrum sets into motion the complex mechanisms inside the ear, and after a long path, rather like the Cog advertisement, ends up making some nerves vibrate. The nerves send electrical signals to the brain, …

Reading List, December 2017

Brian Merchant, How email open tracking quietly took over the world, in Wired, 11 December 2017. [Online]: is no longer a secret that every website you visit silently tracks you in an effort to maximise ad revenue. What is less known is that emails also track you, through the use of tracking pixels and redirect links. These techniques were used by spammers and legitimate companies alike when creating newsletters or other mass email, in order to figure out their reach. What’s happening now is that private people are also using these techniques in order to create invisible and intrusive read receipts for email, which is incredibly frustrating from a privacy point of view.My solution to the tracking woes? I only open the plain-text component of email, which gets rid of tracking pixels entirely. Redirect links are harder to beat, and I don’t have a good solution for this.Dan Luu, Computer latency 1977–2017. D…