Skip to main content

On Coffee and Other Stuff

One of the prerequisites of grad school is that you need to drink a lot of coffee.

Not because you like it, but because you have to.

Coffee is just wonderful. It's about the only addictive substance that you're allowed to consume legally; heck, you can even drive with a BCC (blood caffeine count) of 101. In fact, the DMV advises you to drink coffee to prevent sleeping at the wheel. Surprising, considering that caffeine is more addictive than marijuana[cite].

Caffeine has been known to inhibit repair of cellular DNA, and cause a lot of harm to general health of the user. In large doses (more than 250 mg), it can severely interfere with the central nervous system, just like any other drug. Why then do grad students live on coffee?

Well, mainly, it's to stay awake. It's not unusual to have 3 homework deadlines on the same day, and this calls for all nighters just to get the damn homework finished. Also, some folks like dear KK have an "all-nighter schedule" just before conference deadlines. Oh, come on, did you think that all-nighters are spontaneous? No, they are damn well planned, sometimes, with months of preparation going on before the big night.

But I ramble. Or do I really? I'm not sure; considering that it's been a week since I've had caffeine in my system. Can you believe it, I've now started using Nescafé instead of heading over to Starbucks. Well, we only have such a limited stipend...

It's difficult to actually walk past Starbucks every day, and decide to not head inside and order a double shot espresso, or a mocha, or a Java chip. Sometimes, my head spins round so much that I feel like running away, and grabbing the bitter sweet nectar that will allow me to concentrate on whatever I plan to do. One look at my fast depleting bank account jerks me back to reality.

So, all in all, I'm trying to stay away from coffee as much as I can. Coffee houses are expensive, and exist to leech you by getting you addicted to their products. Ever wondered how do they manage to have so many coffee houses next to each other, at prime locations?

Of course, there are people that are NRT (not really trying) when they go to a coffee house, order a large no-fat no foam double caramel decaf latte; open their Macbooks, scribble some insipid remarks on their blog, and think that they are damn authors...

This post has been written in jest. If it has offended you in any way, MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
Labels:

Comments

  1. KM20 October 2012 at 11:44

    and do I love your latest post! sarcasm, related to a topic I hold SO dear (a self-proclaimed coffee lover), wid all the interesting elements of my life portrayed with such subtle condemnation... a 'dream-post'! I feel like hugging y- damn, I AM in need of an espresso shot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Skand Hurkat20 October 2012 at 11:50

      Thanks for being such a dear follower of this blog KM! Yes coffee is something that I too am particularly fond of; and that's why it's fun to write a post about it. Especially after you hear other people's opinions about coffee. :)

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Harry Potter and why I dislike the series

There could not be a better time for this post. There could not have been a worse time for this post. Now that the penultimate movie of the series is out, and my facebook wall filled with people who loved the movie. But this is something I really wanted to say, and I shall say it anyway. Harry Potter is pathetic literature. Now, you must be wondering why I say that. There are many reasons. Firstly, the storyline itself is flawed. When a writer sits down to write anything, he/she must set up some essential rules about what is happening. These rules must remain constant irrespective of how many times he/she changes his/her mind. This is so that the readers are allowed to have some sensibility in what they are reading. In the fourth book, Rowling goes ahead and kills Cedric. Then, at the end of the book, the horseless carriages are there again. Nothing special. We all knew that they are horseless. But then comes the fifth book, and BAM, the horses are actually winged beasts that only thos...
18 comments
Read more

On the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard

This is a post that I have been meaning to write from quite some time. Long hours spent typing code on my computer left my hands fatigued, and left me with a lot of pain in my wrists and fingers. That is when I decided to use the Dvorak. But I have got the same bad habit as Dr. Watson, to tell a story backwards. Of course, you must be wondering what the Dvorak is. The story of keyboards starts with the invention of the typewriter. Christopher Sholes, the inventor of the typewriter, tried with a two row piano style keyboard. But then, he got into many difficulties with the design. Then he finally settled for a four row design. This was similar to the QWERTY layout that most computers and typewriters today possess. The engineers at Remington, to whom Sholes had presented his design modified the layout a little further, and then the QWERTY was born. As typewriters became popular, people got used to the layout, and started practising touch typing, i.e. typing without looking at the keys...
Post a Comment
Read more

The paradox of government

I'm fascinated by the concept of government, and the paradoxes it presents. On one hand, governments grant us a certain set of rights or liberties. On the other hand, they work to strip us of the very liberties they promise. Now, I don't mean that all governments strip people of liberties, but there are liberal regimes, and there are sufficiently restrictive and dictatorial ones. Both models may have results to show, it does not mean that people in a restrictive regime are unhappy (refer to Dan Dennett's TED talk , where he states that ideas or memes can be dangerous when taken from one part of the world, where they are widespread, and, using the virus analogy, where people are immune to the memes; to a part of the world where they are foreign, where people may not be immune to the memes and where people may get infected). History has shown that people were sufficiently satisfied with autocratic governments with a benevolent dictator, and that people in other parts of the ...
Post a Comment
Read more