Skip to main content

All Hail The Idiots!

All hail the idiots, for it is the idiots who run the world.

Confused? Let me explain...

People are idiotic. They yammer and yell, and yet do nothing, but run the world. The ones who do the actual work are often silent spectators, fed up of the idiots that rule them.

Calling my readers "idiots" does not make for healthy relationships, so I'll refrain from doing so. But I'm fed up of the idiots that dictate how I live my life.

The idiots pay $ 20 for a movie they cannot copy on their computer, because the DVD is encrypted. The idiots are willing to pay $ 1000 for a software that does the same work they could do for free. The idiots keep the big corporations alive, which then dictate how we live our lives.

Yet, it is by the action of the idiots that our world, as we know it, can continue. Think of it... how different would life be, where everyone could make their own movies and share them with the world. If anyone wanted to do anything, (s)he could do it him/herself. No calling the plumber, or the carpenter, or the bricklayer. Everyone would be fully capable of doing such work themselves.

It is not clear when the concept of division of labour was first conceived. Apparently, that was the biggest mistake of mankind. The moment we decided to be wilfully idiotic about some aspects, that was when we allowed anyone to fleece us. Think of it, your sink leaks, so fix it; instead of calling the plumber for $ 100. If the plumber would not get enough jobs, he would just lower his rates.

Of course, you'll say that it is not practical for us to learn plumbing along with the various other tasks that we'd have to master if this model is to succeed. Of course, my argument is oversimplified. But I like oversimplifications. They present an easy way for me to present my point. Of course, what I'm really talking about is the whole way we have created walls that prevent creativity, that stifle innovation, and that are pulling our society back to the past. Idiots!

Just think. When did we idiots, in the course of our evolution suddenly decide that only some people would be the creative ones, and that the others would be idiotic mules just following orders of the ones designated to create? When did we decide to pay through the nose to big corporations who just chmod 700 on all their material?

Yet, it is a fact that we can pay $ 40 for a set of 16 Photoshop Actions, and then spend another $ 999 on Adobe Photoshop. We are willing to pay $ 500 on a copy of MS Office, but we don't bother when legislation is passed which allows patents on fundamental data structures like linked lists, which makes it impossible for any ordinary programmer to write awesome software without going on the wrong side of the law. Why have we made our lives so complicated that we cannot do anything without the help of a lawyer?

Yes, it is the idiots who run the world. The idiots are willing to pay whatever amount I ask, for a piece of software I write, for which I shall never give the source code, which I shall never allow them to modify (If I ever write code, it will be GPLed, don't worry, this is just hypothetical). The idiots are willing to pay up to $ 40 for 16x40 lines of code. The idiots are amazing. They make me rich.

Seriously, how would a world be where we were all smart, and could do our own stuff? We'd all have lesser money, but we'd also have to pay less. Perhaps it would lead to more unemployment, and consequently, would be unable to support the entire population. Maybe that's why we need the idiots.

All hail the idiots, for it is the idiots who run the world.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Harry Potter and why I dislike the series

There could not be a better time for this post. There could not have been a worse time for this post. Now that the penultimate movie of the series is out, and my facebook wall filled with people who loved the movie. But this is something I really wanted to say, and I shall say it anyway. Harry Potter is pathetic literature. Now, you must be wondering why I say that. There are many reasons. Firstly, the storyline itself is flawed. When a writer sits down to write anything, he/she must set up some essential rules about what is happening. These rules must remain constant irrespective of how many times he/she changes his/her mind. This is so that the readers are allowed to have some sensibility in what they are reading. In the fourth book, Rowling goes ahead and kills Cedric. Then, at the end of the book, the horseless carriages are there again. Nothing special. We all knew that they are horseless. But then comes the fifth book, and BAM, the horses are actually winged beasts that only thos...
18 comments
Read more

On the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard

This is a post that I have been meaning to write from quite some time. Long hours spent typing code on my computer left my hands fatigued, and left me with a lot of pain in my wrists and fingers. That is when I decided to use the Dvorak. But I have got the same bad habit as Dr. Watson, to tell a story backwards. Of course, you must be wondering what the Dvorak is. The story of keyboards starts with the invention of the typewriter. Christopher Sholes, the inventor of the typewriter, tried with a two row piano style keyboard. But then, he got into many difficulties with the design. Then he finally settled for a four row design. This was similar to the QWERTY layout that most computers and typewriters today possess. The engineers at Remington, to whom Sholes had presented his design modified the layout a little further, and then the QWERTY was born. As typewriters became popular, people got used to the layout, and started practising touch typing, i.e. typing without looking at the keys...
Post a Comment
Read more

The paradox of government

I'm fascinated by the concept of government, and the paradoxes it presents. On one hand, governments grant us a certain set of rights or liberties. On the other hand, they work to strip us of the very liberties they promise. Now, I don't mean that all governments strip people of liberties, but there are liberal regimes, and there are sufficiently restrictive and dictatorial ones. Both models may have results to show, it does not mean that people in a restrictive regime are unhappy (refer to Dan Dennett's TED talk , where he states that ideas or memes can be dangerous when taken from one part of the world, where they are widespread, and, using the virus analogy, where people are immune to the memes; to a part of the world where they are foreign, where people may not be immune to the memes and where people may get infected). History has shown that people were sufficiently satisfied with autocratic governments with a benevolent dictator, and that people in other parts of the ...
Post a Comment
Read more