Skip to main content

Shahrukh Khan wants to follow me on Google Buzz

Yesterday, Google Buzz notified me that Shahrukh Khan wants to follow me. Of course, given Buzz's default action, he already was following me, that is, until I blocked him!

Shahrukh Khan following me! Doesn't that seem absurd. When a celebrity tries to follow a nobody, the nobody has to be really pig-headed to allow the celebrity to follow him. I mean, it should be obvious to the nobody that the celebrity profile is actually fake.

I took some pains to check out Shahrukh Khan's profile. It had 130 odd followers and followed 1300. Weird, isn't it, considering that at the time of publishing this blog, he follows 49 and is followed by 798,768 people on twitter? Further, his profile had a single post on Buzz, a picture of him taken out of some glossy, with the text My new look for Don2

So, what obvious steps did I take besides blocking him? I also reported the profile to Google as a fake. It is obvious that someone is using some kind of a crawling script to follow random people. I wonder why? Does he hope to get some random titbits of people's lives? Does he possibly try and harvest email ids of people to spam them? Or does he just want to prove the gullibility of the people who allow him to follow them? I can only make a guess.

I have long wanted to write about the flawed privacy policy followed by Google, and the hazards of having a one-id-for-all-services service.

With Google Buzz, it was compulsory to have a public profile, which anyone on the net could see. Here, thankfully, Google gave us two options. Either have your username in your profile url, or have an obscure string/number hash in the profile url. It's a lose-lose both ways.

I have chosen the url of this blog the way it is, because it makes sense. I want my profile to make sense too. I want that anyone who wishes to see my profile can be given an easy-to-remember url. However, I do not want my email id to be my url. That would invite loads of spam.

Buzz makes crawling for email addresses easier. I can go to any random person's buzz, there check the list of people he is following, check if their profiles have a proper name or if their profiles are random numbers. This way, I have a reasonable amount of email ids using a crawling script. Or I could go in further, and check all the comments on a person's post by his followers/friends, and harvest their email ids too. By the idea of six degrees of separation, I could, in principle I would need a depth 6 recursion to go through everybody's profiles.

And again, there is the annoying policy of follow-by-default-unless-I-block-you. This means that people may end up following me without my knowledge. No harm there, you may say, considering that my Buzz is public on the web anyway, nevertheless, I consider it a breach of privacy.

People who have been following my blog for some time would have noticed that I have recently added a subscribe-via-email option. Why did it take me so long to put that option in? That is because my feeds are delivered via feedburner, and it has a nasty way of putting in my email id as the sender of the mail. This would mean that again, my email id would not be private any longer. This clearly was unacceptable.

It took me some time to contemplate whether or not to create a new id, so as to connect my feeds with that id. I figured that there would hardly be any subscribers to my blog, and those would generally be friends or people that I know. Nevertheless, I could not be too sure, and hence I ended up with two email ids and no subscribers-via-email.

If only Google would have allowed my email id to not be on the emails sent via my blog, they might have saved 7000 odd MB of disk space.

Popular posts from this blog

Progressive Snapshot: Is it worth it?

I turned 25 last year, which in the highly mathematical and calculating eyes of the US insurance industry meant that I had suddenly matured into a much more responsible driver than I was at 24 years and 364 days of age. As a result, I expected my insurance rates to go down. Imagine my surprise when my insurance renewal notice from GEICO actually quoted a $50 increase in my insurance rates. To me, this was a clear signal that it was time to switch companies.Typically, I score really high on brand loyalty. I tend to stick with a brand for as long as possible, unless they really mess up. This qualified as a major mess up. As a result, I started shopping for insurance quotes.Two companies that quoted me significantly lower rates (30%–40% lower) were Progressive and Allstate. Both had an optional programme that could give me further discounts based on my consenting to the companies tracking my driving habits. Now, I am a careful driver – I hardly ever accelerate hard. I hate using the brak…

Cornell Graduate Students United: At What Cost?

On Monday and Tuesday, we graduate students at Cornell will be voting on whether or not we want to unionise. Actually, scratch that, only graduate students who hold a TA, RA, or GRA appointment can unionise.This is a shitty arrangement, and I will be voting against it.For those of you who are not aware of how graduate school works at Cornell, you could be on one of many appointments.FellowshipA graduate student on a fellowship gets a stipend and tuition paid without associated teaching or research opportunities. Graduate students on a fellowship typically work towards their own theses, but will be excluded from the unionGraduate research assistantshipsA GRA gives a graduate student stipend and tuition without teaching responsibilities. However, this money comes out of a specific project grant, and the students typically work on their own theses. Students on GRAs magically qualify to join the union, whereas there is virtually no difference between a GRA and a fellowship for the most pa…

Reading List, April 2017

Adam Carroll, When money isn’t real: The $10,000 experiment, in TEDxLondonBusinessSchool, 9 July 2015. [Online]: Carroll presents an interesting point – we have abstracted away money through the use of a number of instruments, such as credit and debit cards, NFC payment systems on our phones, and in-app purchases, when we don’t realise how much we are actually spending. Carroll spends some time showing how his kids, aged 7–11 played monopoly differently when they were playing with real money. He goes on to lay his premise, that financial literacy must be taught to children at a young age, when they should be allowed to fail and learn from their failures at a small scale, not at the hundreds of thousands of dollars when they are in student loan debt and just out of college.Carroll’s talk hit a lot of notes with my own experiences with money, and I’m sure that it would resonate with your experiences as well.Brett Scott, If plastic replaces cash, much tha…