Skip to main content

On Wubi and installing Linux

Well, here is the post that most of my friends would have tired hearing me repeat. However, there really are no good OSs out there that can truly satisfy my requirements.

So, a course that I am currently completing discusses the POSIX API, and the UNIX system. For trying out any of the concepts in the course, I would need to have at least a Linux installation. But which one should I choose?

I require my Linux installation to be friendly, so GNOME is a must. Moreover, it must have support for easily installing non-free software, like Adobe Reader, EAGLE, flash, MP3 plugins etc. It should be stable and functional, and should be fast, efficient, and better than Windows :) in terms of speed and power management. Naturally, there are three contenders. Ubuntu, Fedora, OpenSUSE.

Ubuntu

Debian based, Ubuntu seems to be the distro of choice for many who are switching from Windows to Linux. It has many features that facilitate an easy migration, especially ability to shrink Windows partitions, to automatically migrate documents and settings from Windows and support for non-free software. Synaptic package manager is really cool, and recently, they have added an extra Ubuntu software centre that is even better. Amongst the features Ubuntu offers is WUBI, a method to install Ubuntu inside Windows, like any other program, without the need for a separate partition. Needless to say, this installation comes with a handy uninstall button.

Fedora

An offshoot of RedHat Enterprise, Fedora is accused by many as being a sort of Beta testing centre for RedHat. It features the latest of all software, and hence, can be very buggy. However, most of the bugs are fixed in a few days after the release. However, one of the most irritating aspects of Fedora is its emphasis on free (as in freedom) software. Needless to say, it can take a lot of effort to even get a simple MP3 song playing.

OpenSUSE

OpenSUSE comes from Novell. I have only tried it briefly, I installed the OS once on my computer, and it did not boot after the very first update. The same behaviour was observed twice over, and I decided to not install it again.



Given the above options, I had to choose Ubuntu. I decided to install it.

So this is what happened when I tried installing:

  1. Shrink Windows partition to make space for Ubuntu: Failed as it showed only 5GB of shrink space available. 170GB available space on C:\.
  2. Use GParted to shrink windows partition: Failed and showed 0 bytes used space on /dev/sda1. All my data appears to be lost.
  3. Use checkdisk on my Windows partition: No errors found. My data appears to be safe.
  4. Install Ubuntu using Wubi: Failed because I was not connected to the net.
  5. iGiveUp!

Finally, I managed to install Ubuntu (Maverick) using WUBI. Now, I cannot install software because of proxy authentication problems. Apparently, I need to now use Synaptic Package manager only, and I cannot use the command line apt-get. This is because Ubuntu is trying to become better and more user-friendly and is trying to lure Windows users.

So, all in all, no good OS left for me.


PS: Feel free to suggest any good OS that you may have in mind.

Comments

  1. have you tried "export http_proxy=http://myuname:mypass@myproxy:myport"
    (without sudo)?

    ReplyDelete
  2. That is a workaround. There are many such workarounds that use. However, the system should work without workarounds, that is the mark of a good system.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Harry Potter and why I dislike the series

There could not be a better time for this post. There could not have been a worse time for this post. Now that the penultimate movie of the series is out, and my facebook wall filled with people who loved the movie. But this is something I really wanted to say, and I shall say it anyway. Harry Potter is pathetic literature. Now, you must be wondering why I say that. There are many reasons. Firstly, the storyline itself is flawed. When a writer sits down to write anything, he/she must set up some essential rules about what is happening. These rules must remain constant irrespective of how many times he/she changes his/her mind. This is so that the readers are allowed to have some sensibility in what they are reading. In the fourth book, Rowling goes ahead and kills Cedric. Then, at the end of the book, the horseless carriages are there again. Nothing special. We all knew that they are horseless. But then comes the fifth book, and BAM, the horses are actually winged beasts that only thos

ERROR_SUCCESS

ERROR_SUCCESS. This macro would be familiar to all those who have done some programming in WIN32. It is the output of the GetLastError() function to check the thread's last error state when no error has occurred. Weird, isn't it? I mean, if it is a success, then why is it marked as an error in the macro? This is one example of a badly made API. APIs are considered bad when programming in them becomes non-intuitive. Software is said to be bad (or said to suck) when it seems counter-intuitive to the user. There is one very simple example of this. Start notepad. Type in any text. Click on close. The message that you see is: This makes no sense to me as a user. Of course, the programmer follows the approach that he creates a temporary file called Untitled , and in that file he allows the user to make all his changes. But how am I, as a user to understand that? A similar disconnect occurs even between two different programmers. That is why it takes a whole lot of effort to make

Elements of a Story: The Whispers

I'm compelled to begin each post with a meta. That way, my blog posts seem less like essays or dissertations, and more like diary entries, or web logs. So here goes... I started this blog a little over a year ago. The main purpose of this blog was to experiment with styles of writing, and find an effective outlet for all the subjects I wish to rant about; saving my classmates the agony of having to listen to them. As I wrote this blog, I've experimented with so many styles, and have received comments claiming that my work is a shameless copy greatly inspired by so-and-so author/work. Fact is that I simply chanced upon that style. I read, so obviously, my work shall reflect the styles of those I admire, but I've worked out so many styles without even knowing that they exist, only to be informed of them later. Recently, I've been struck with the seeming absence of whispers as an element of a story. The more I've thought of the subject, the more I've been convince