Skip to main content

On Wubi and installing Linux

Well, here is the post that most of my friends would have tired hearing me repeat. However, there really are no good OSs out there that can truly satisfy my requirements.

So, a course that I am currently completing discusses the POSIX API, and the UNIX system. For trying out any of the concepts in the course, I would need to have at least a Linux installation. But which one should I choose?

I require my Linux installation to be friendly, so GNOME is a must. Moreover, it must have support for easily installing non-free software, like Adobe Reader, EAGLE, flash, MP3 plugins etc. It should be stable and functional, and should be fast, efficient, and better than Windows :) in terms of speed and power management. Naturally, there are three contenders. Ubuntu, Fedora, OpenSUSE.

Ubuntu

Debian based, Ubuntu seems to be the distro of choice for many who are switching from Windows to Linux. It has many features that facilitate an easy migration, especially ability to shrink Windows partitions, to automatically migrate documents and settings from Windows and support for non-free software. Synaptic package manager is really cool, and recently, they have added an extra Ubuntu software centre that is even better. Amongst the features Ubuntu offers is WUBI, a method to install Ubuntu inside Windows, like any other program, without the need for a separate partition. Needless to say, this installation comes with a handy uninstall button.

Fedora

An offshoot of RedHat Enterprise, Fedora is accused by many as being a sort of Beta testing centre for RedHat. It features the latest of all software, and hence, can be very buggy. However, most of the bugs are fixed in a few days after the release. However, one of the most irritating aspects of Fedora is its emphasis on free (as in freedom) software. Needless to say, it can take a lot of effort to even get a simple MP3 song playing.

OpenSUSE

OpenSUSE comes from Novell. I have only tried it briefly, I installed the OS once on my computer, and it did not boot after the very first update. The same behaviour was observed twice over, and I decided to not install it again.



Given the above options, I had to choose Ubuntu. I decided to install it.

So this is what happened when I tried installing:

  1. Shrink Windows partition to make space for Ubuntu: Failed as it showed only 5GB of shrink space available. 170GB available space on C:\.
  2. Use GParted to shrink windows partition: Failed and showed 0 bytes used space on /dev/sda1. All my data appears to be lost.
  3. Use checkdisk on my Windows partition: No errors found. My data appears to be safe.
  4. Install Ubuntu using Wubi: Failed because I was not connected to the net.
  5. iGiveUp!

Finally, I managed to install Ubuntu (Maverick) using WUBI. Now, I cannot install software because of proxy authentication problems. Apparently, I need to now use Synaptic Package manager only, and I cannot use the command line apt-get. This is because Ubuntu is trying to become better and more user-friendly and is trying to lure Windows users.

So, all in all, no good OS left for me.


PS: Feel free to suggest any good OS that you may have in mind.

Labels:

Comments

  1. Mehul27 October 2010 at 10:09

    have you tried "export http_proxy=http://myuname:mypass@myproxy:myport"
    (without sudo)?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous27 October 2010 at 11:55

    That is a workaround. There are many such workarounds that use. However, the system should work without workarounds, that is the mark of a good system.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Harry Potter and why I dislike the series

There could not be a better time for this post. There could not have been a worse time for this post. Now that the penultimate movie of the series is out, and my facebook wall filled with people who loved the movie. But this is something I really wanted to say, and I shall say it anyway. Harry Potter is pathetic literature. Now, you must be wondering why I say that. There are many reasons. Firstly, the storyline itself is flawed. When a writer sits down to write anything, he/she must set up some essential rules about what is happening. These rules must remain constant irrespective of how many times he/she changes his/her mind. This is so that the readers are allowed to have some sensibility in what they are reading. In the fourth book, Rowling goes ahead and kills Cedric. Then, at the end of the book, the horseless carriages are there again. Nothing special. We all knew that they are horseless. But then comes the fifth book, and BAM, the horses are actually winged beasts that only thos...
18 comments
Read more

On the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard

This is a post that I have been meaning to write from quite some time. Long hours spent typing code on my computer left my hands fatigued, and left me with a lot of pain in my wrists and fingers. That is when I decided to use the Dvorak. But I have got the same bad habit as Dr. Watson, to tell a story backwards. Of course, you must be wondering what the Dvorak is. The story of keyboards starts with the invention of the typewriter. Christopher Sholes, the inventor of the typewriter, tried with a two row piano style keyboard. But then, he got into many difficulties with the design. Then he finally settled for a four row design. This was similar to the QWERTY layout that most computers and typewriters today possess. The engineers at Remington, to whom Sholes had presented his design modified the layout a little further, and then the QWERTY was born. As typewriters became popular, people got used to the layout, and started practising touch typing, i.e. typing without looking at the keys...
Post a Comment
Read more

The paradox of government

I'm fascinated by the concept of government, and the paradoxes it presents. On one hand, governments grant us a certain set of rights or liberties. On the other hand, they work to strip us of the very liberties they promise. Now, I don't mean that all governments strip people of liberties, but there are liberal regimes, and there are sufficiently restrictive and dictatorial ones. Both models may have results to show, it does not mean that people in a restrictive regime are unhappy (refer to Dan Dennett's TED talk , where he states that ideas or memes can be dangerous when taken from one part of the world, where they are widespread, and, using the virus analogy, where people are immune to the memes; to a part of the world where they are foreign, where people may not be immune to the memes and where people may get infected). History has shown that people were sufficiently satisfied with autocratic governments with a benevolent dictator, and that people in other parts of the ...
Post a Comment
Read more