Skip to main content

Dangerous Democracy With Arvind Kejriwal

Hello, and welcome to this pilot episode of Dangerous Democracy with Arvind Kejriwal. In this series, I will attempt to expose (cue: dramatic tone) the dangerous ideas that are being propagated by those who seek to be elected.

Let's start with the underdog here. The AAP, a nascent party, has suddenly sprung out of the wilderness as the most dangerous party in the world. It feeds on the peoples' fear of corruption and fools them into a false sense of security with its innocuous sounding name; which portrays it as something that is for the common person. However, behind the innocuous façade, and the X is worse than Y game lies a dangerous mind. The mind of Arvind Kejriwal, politician wannabe, and complete moron.

For once, let's not go over the utter idiocies of the AAP's short term in Delhi, which ended in a temper tantrum that would put any five year old to shame. Let's go to the point before they were ever elected. To the book that should have warned us of the dangers of AK's Swaraj.

Swaraj means self-rule. This itself is ridiculous in a democracy. As I've often stated in the past [1, 2], that is just not how democracy, or government for that matter, should function. Just like I wouldn't open the bonnet and tinker with the engine in my car, I wouldn't trust myself to be a good administrator, knowing fully the complexities of managing a whole country. AK, however, chooses to ignore this. He thinks that almost everyone in the country should be part of his "Gram Sabhas" which is just because "Panchayat" was already taken by the current system. He thinks that having a billion yammering yobs will be better than the current parliamentary system. To prove his point, he dramatically points out the story of Amrapali, which has been told in the classic "Vaishali ki Nagarvadhu," which, to those who don't speak Hindi, translates to "The prostitute from Vaishali." Amrapali was made a prostitute because the people of Vaishali wanted her to whore herself out. She asked for the King's palace as compensation, and the King had to vacate his palace in order to satisfy the demands of his subjects. Interestingly, AK skips the part where the King built himself a larger palace, using the taxes collected from his subjects. Or the part where Vaishali fell to Ajatshatru just because the people couldn't decide if they wanted to defend themselves.

Jumping to the present, AK presents a cherry-picked selection of Indian villages where apparently, "self rule" has worked wonders. Actually, that's just people not being lazy bums and doing some real work, but let's gloss over that for the moment. Now, what was that saying about one swallow and the summer? Funny, but I just can't place it...

Think about it. There has never been an idea so dangerous to democracy, and the sovereignty of the Republic of India. This one guy, with absolutely no credentials (he's from IIT-KGP, and let's face it --- folks from the IITs know absolutely nothing about anything), can single-handedly destroy democracy faster than the Widow (with the upper-case W) did with the emergency. According to him, we don't need the federal structure. Let everyone make their own laws. Just give people money, no strings attached, and hope that they will solve their problems. That is one hell of a leap of faith. In fact, I would rather jump off the Burj Khalifa than take the leap of faith that AK has taken. As you know, I don't like people. Indian's on the other hand, are complete imbeciles when it comes to understanding governance, going more by passion than by the laws of the land. What AK proposes, in effect, is to have Khap panchayats at every nook-and-cranny in the country.

I've always held that Indian democracy is remarkable. It's better than American democracy, because we have a balance of powers. It's better than English democracy, because we are a republic. We granted everyone above a certain age the right to vote, unlike countries which practised discrimination years after Indian independence. At the same time, India understood the challenges it faced, and adapted to overcome those challenges. For instance, we dropped jury trials as soon as we realised that they don't deliver justice (refer to the Nanavati v Maharashtra). We worked hard to bring the panchayats to an active form of government. We've survived emergency imposed by a crazed lady, we've survived for 67 years without understanding an iota of what a true democracy represents.

Which is why AK is perhaps the biggest danger that Indian democracy faces. After 60 years of corrupt and incompetent "rule" by a single party, which has sucked out all hope from the citizens, AK comes in dressed as Napolean by Old Major's side, singing "communalism is worse than corruption is worse than inter-caste marriages is worse than bachelorhood is worse than dynasty is worse than capitalism is worse than corruption." Soon, he drops all association with Old Major, even calling him out for being in league with the humans. With his sheep fanboys singing his praise, and Squealer on his side, he built a wall painted with the rules of AAPism. Of course, he later ended up offering freebies to win elections, initiated tainted people with serious charges, kicked out Snowball because he wouldn't sing his tune, before being caught painting over the constitution. Then he quit in a massive tantrum, in front of the sheep singing "AAP good, others bad." Perhaps a good thing, as Boxer still hasn't been sold to the knacker, and the pigs haven't yet started walking upright.

I still haven't said all the stuff I want to say about AK; but on that bombshell, I have to end this post. Until next time, goodbye, and good luck.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Harry Potter and why I dislike the series

There could not be a better time for this post. There could not have been a worse time for this post. Now that the penultimate movie of the series is out, and my facebook wall filled with people who loved the movie. But this is something I really wanted to say, and I shall say it anyway. Harry Potter is pathetic literature. Now, you must be wondering why I say that. There are many reasons. Firstly, the storyline itself is flawed. When a writer sits down to write anything, he/she must set up some essential rules about what is happening. These rules must remain constant irrespective of how many times he/she changes his/her mind. This is so that the readers are allowed to have some sensibility in what they are reading. In the fourth book, Rowling goes ahead and kills Cedric. Then, at the end of the book, the horseless carriages are there again. Nothing special. We all knew that they are horseless. But then comes the fifth book, and BAM, the horses are actually winged beasts that only thos

ERROR_SUCCESS

ERROR_SUCCESS. This macro would be familiar to all those who have done some programming in WIN32. It is the output of the GetLastError() function to check the thread's last error state when no error has occurred. Weird, isn't it? I mean, if it is a success, then why is it marked as an error in the macro? This is one example of a badly made API. APIs are considered bad when programming in them becomes non-intuitive. Software is said to be bad (or said to suck) when it seems counter-intuitive to the user. There is one very simple example of this. Start notepad. Type in any text. Click on close. The message that you see is: This makes no sense to me as a user. Of course, the programmer follows the approach that he creates a temporary file called Untitled , and in that file he allows the user to make all his changes. But how am I, as a user to understand that? A similar disconnect occurs even between two different programmers. That is why it takes a whole lot of effort to make

Elements of a Story: The Whispers

I'm compelled to begin each post with a meta. That way, my blog posts seem less like essays or dissertations, and more like diary entries, or web logs. So here goes... I started this blog a little over a year ago. The main purpose of this blog was to experiment with styles of writing, and find an effective outlet for all the subjects I wish to rant about; saving my classmates the agony of having to listen to them. As I wrote this blog, I've experimented with so many styles, and have received comments claiming that my work is a shameless copy greatly inspired by so-and-so author/work. Fact is that I simply chanced upon that style. I read, so obviously, my work shall reflect the styles of those I admire, but I've worked out so many styles without even knowing that they exist, only to be informed of them later. Recently, I've been struck with the seeming absence of whispers as an element of a story. The more I've thought of the subject, the more I've been convince