Skip to main content

Large Screens? Not For Me!

Thinking that I've lost it? No, you read that title right, I'm making a case for small screens (albeit many of them).

I've recently been given a 27 inch iMac by my advisor. This does nothing to change my feelings, I still think that Macs suck, and that they are one of the most gimped excuses for a computer. But that's for another post. Right now, I'll be making a case against big displays, and that holds for any computer, not just Macs.

The argument starts off with Fitt's Law. This is a law which relates the time taken to point at a target using a pointing device like a mouse, and relates the time to the log of the distance to the target divided by the width of the target. For convenience, I've listed the law, in mathematical form below.

Basically, all that it says is rather obvious. If you're trying to point at a tiny target located a mile away, you're screwed. But that's what happens with every large display. Note that I'm talking about large in terms of pixels, not physical size. It's perfectly fine to use a 1280x720 projector projecting on an IMAX screen (okay, IMAX fans, I've downgraded the IMAX effect, but it's just to make a point).

With a screen that's huge, in terms of number of pixels, your targets (like simple close, minimise or maximise buttons) become too tiny and too far away. This means a hell lot of wrist movement, when using a mouse, and that's never a pleasure.

The next thing is in terms of distractions. Mostly, I like to have just one thing open on my screen at a time, unless I'm referring to something else; but at any time, I just have one task open on my screen, and that helps focus by removing all distractions. With a small screen, there really is no place to keep too much stuff on the screen, and I end up using multiple workspaces. As a result, sometimes, during coding binge sessions, I end up writing code for hours on end (sometimes starting just after lunch, and continuing till dinner), never once switching to my workspace containing GMail or Facebook.

With large displays, I invariably end up having a browser open next to vim, and that's never good. It means more distractions, especially when you see the tab that prints out the number of notifications (yes, I know I can log out, but I'm addicted to the web).

Frankly, I don't really need so many pixels. I code in Vim, and that fits inside an 80x24 console. I could be fine with just a 10 inch netbook. The only time when I need extra space is when I refer to something else, like C++ reference, or StackOverflow.

So what's my ideal setup? A wide array of monitors (actually, just two), one with a browser open for reference, and another where I do all my work, ideally separated by a good amount, so that my primary monitor is right in front of me, and the secondary (used for reference) does not bother me unless I consciously look at it. Of course, it's with the cost factored in. All I'm saying is that I'd rather have two 17 inch monitors than one 27 inch monitor.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Harry Potter and why I dislike the series

There could not be a better time for this post. There could not have been a worse time for this post. Now that the penultimate movie of the series is out, and my facebook wall filled with people who loved the movie. But this is something I really wanted to say, and I shall say it anyway. Harry Potter is pathetic literature. Now, you must be wondering why I say that. There are many reasons. Firstly, the storyline itself is flawed. When a writer sits down to write anything, he/she must set up some essential rules about what is happening. These rules must remain constant irrespective of how many times he/she changes his/her mind. This is so that the readers are allowed to have some sensibility in what they are reading. In the fourth book, Rowling goes ahead and kills Cedric. Then, at the end of the book, the horseless carriages are there again. Nothing special. We all knew that they are horseless. But then comes the fifth book, and BAM, the horses are actually winged beasts that only thos...
18 comments
Read more

On the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard

This is a post that I have been meaning to write from quite some time. Long hours spent typing code on my computer left my hands fatigued, and left me with a lot of pain in my wrists and fingers. That is when I decided to use the Dvorak. But I have got the same bad habit as Dr. Watson, to tell a story backwards. Of course, you must be wondering what the Dvorak is. The story of keyboards starts with the invention of the typewriter. Christopher Sholes, the inventor of the typewriter, tried with a two row piano style keyboard. But then, he got into many difficulties with the design. Then he finally settled for a four row design. This was similar to the QWERTY layout that most computers and typewriters today possess. The engineers at Remington, to whom Sholes had presented his design modified the layout a little further, and then the QWERTY was born. As typewriters became popular, people got used to the layout, and started practising touch typing, i.e. typing without looking at the keys...
Post a Comment
Read more

The paradox of government

I'm fascinated by the concept of government, and the paradoxes it presents. On one hand, governments grant us a certain set of rights or liberties. On the other hand, they work to strip us of the very liberties they promise. Now, I don't mean that all governments strip people of liberties, but there are liberal regimes, and there are sufficiently restrictive and dictatorial ones. Both models may have results to show, it does not mean that people in a restrictive regime are unhappy (refer to Dan Dennett's TED talk , where he states that ideas or memes can be dangerous when taken from one part of the world, where they are widespread, and, using the virus analogy, where people are immune to the memes; to a part of the world where they are foreign, where people may not be immune to the memes and where people may get infected). History has shown that people were sufficiently satisfied with autocratic governments with a benevolent dictator, and that people in other parts of the ...
Post a Comment
Read more