Skip to main content


This was the subject of an email I received from someone I know. The message asked for my review of the Aakash tablet, a low cost tablet which the Indian government in promoting. I replied with a verdict: uninspiring.

My reasons were thus: The processor was pathetic; I cannot expect an ARM running at 366 MHz to provide any reliable computing. My mobile phone runs Android 2.3, and has a 600 MHz processor. Yet, I find it sluggish. To compound the problem is just 256 MB of RAM. I really cannot expect any performance from this tablet. Pathetic configuration is the first thing that ruins a computing experience.

Further, the tablet has no 3G or GPRS, only WiFi (This is set to change in the next release of the tablet, with a better processor and Android 2.3 and GPRS connectivity, but still, I really cannot understand the point of including WiFi over 3G. After all, how many people who are the target audience of the government possess access to WiFi. If they did, why would they buy Aakash over anything else?

The battery is just pathetic, with 2300 mAh, it lasts for just 180 minutes, or 3 hours. In contrast, my laptop lasts me for 6 hours on a fully charged battery, a MacBook lasts for up to 9 hours on battery. If I would design a mobile computing platform, I will definitely design it so that it lasts for a considerable amount of time on battery. It will be pretty useless if it runs out of juice in 3 hours, considering that unplanned load-shedding in non-important villages in India extend for around 18 hours.

The touchscreen is resistive. Frankly, this is the best way to screw up any product today. Everyone loves capacitive touch screens, they are much easier to use, and support multi-touch gestures. Put in a resistive touch screen, and suddenly, you've lost everything people expect nowadays from touchscreens.

Aakash does not retail for $35. It costs INR 2500, which is around $50. The $35 is a subsidised price announced by the Indian government. This means that every time a college student buys the Aakash, the Indian taxpayer spends around $15 to support the purchase. Just to offer a comparison, the amount of the subsidy is approximately the earnings of a "below poverty line" family for a month. A million tablets, that's a lot in subsidy, considering that most students already have access to computers, either in their college labs, or possess their own computers.

While we are discussing students, I cannot see any student write his undergraduate thesis on an Aakash tablet. It does not have a real physical keyboard, and hence is a pain to type upon. So, I wonder, what are the students supposed to do with the Aakash. Most colleges don't have WiFi all over their campus. My own university has very select WiFi hotspots, and they are all secured. Even so, I really don't fancy walking over to the department in the middle of the night to access my email. Well, maybe that's what the government really wants. When internet access is difficult, students will not access it, and will sleep on time. Yes, that's what it's about.

Aakash is made by DataWind, a company based in London. I really cannot fathom why the government has agreed to offer a contract to a company based in London, for a tablet that is sub-standard, and heavily subsidised by the Indian taxpayer, when the money for the subsidy could easily be put to better use (in my humble opinion) supporting a family below the poverty line for a whole month. Moreover, the "Take it or leave it" offer made by the government in a market flooded with Android based tablets will hardly go down well with the people.

Popular posts from this blog

Progressive Snapshot: Is it worth it?

I turned 25 last year, which in the highly mathematical and calculating eyes of the US insurance industry meant that I had suddenly matured into a much more responsible driver than I was at 24 years and 364 days of age. As a result, I expected my insurance rates to go down. Imagine my surprise when my insurance renewal notice from GEICO actually quoted a $50 increase in my insurance rates. To me, this was a clear signal that it was time to switch companies.Typically, I score really high on brand loyalty. I tend to stick with a brand for as long as possible, unless they really mess up. This qualified as a major mess up. As a result, I started shopping for insurance quotes.Two companies that quoted me significantly lower rates (30%–40% lower) were Progressive and Allstate. Both had an optional programme that could give me further discounts based on my consenting to the companies tracking my driving habits. Now, I am a careful driver – I hardly ever accelerate hard. I hate using the brak…

Cornell Graduate Students United: At What Cost?

On Monday and Tuesday, we graduate students at Cornell will be voting on whether or not we want to unionise. Actually, scratch that, only graduate students who hold a TA, RA, or GRA appointment can unionise.This is a shitty arrangement, and I will be voting against it.For those of you who are not aware of how graduate school works at Cornell, you could be on one of many appointments.FellowshipA graduate student on a fellowship gets a stipend and tuition paid without associated teaching or research opportunities. Graduate students on a fellowship typically work towards their own theses, but will be excluded from the unionGraduate research assistantshipsA GRA gives a graduate student stipend and tuition without teaching responsibilities. However, this money comes out of a specific project grant, and the students typically work on their own theses. Students on GRAs magically qualify to join the union, whereas there is virtually no difference between a GRA and a fellowship for the most pa…

Reading List, April 2017

Adam Carroll, When money isn’t real: The $10,000 experiment, in TEDxLondonBusinessSchool, 9 July 2015. [Online]: Carroll presents an interesting point – we have abstracted away money through the use of a number of instruments, such as credit and debit cards, NFC payment systems on our phones, and in-app purchases, when we don’t realise how much we are actually spending. Carroll spends some time showing how his kids, aged 7–11 played monopoly differently when they were playing with real money. He goes on to lay his premise, that financial literacy must be taught to children at a young age, when they should be allowed to fail and learn from their failures at a small scale, not at the hundreds of thousands of dollars when they are in student loan debt and just out of college.Carroll’s talk hit a lot of notes with my own experiences with money, and I’m sure that it would resonate with your experiences as well.Brett Scott, If plastic replaces cash, much tha…