Skip to main content

It happens only in India: We struggle to remain "backward"

This is a post I have been wanting to write for the past six years, but have finally decided to shed inhibitions and write it now. Shed inhibitions? Be warned, this post is not politically correct; I have never strived to be politically correct, though I always wish to be morally correct.

Politics in India is dirty. There is no going around the fact. When given a choice to vote, I find myself between a rock and a hard place. None of the manifestos appeal to me. Some political party, which I shall not name, had in its manifesto declared that it shall ban computers from India. How can I, an educated person, and an aspiring engineer ever stand such blasphemy? No computers! Say goodbye to all transport, elevators, microwave ovens, mobile phones, and everything else associated with the past half-century, 'cause all of them rely on microprocessors, or as the layman calls, computers. Yet, in a country with a population over a billion, housing over a seventh of the world's population, such sentiment appeals to the millions who are without jobs. Instead of trying to improve, these people prefer to lay in utter dejection, blaming the government, blaming technology, blaming the rich, blaming the world for the fact that they are jobless. Appeal to their sentiments, and votes are guaranteed. If we cannot make the poor rich, at least make the rich poor. That's the logic that goes on.

Yet, it is not this prolific struggle to remain economically and technologically backward that troubles me the greatest. It does trouble me greatly, but not the most. What troubles me is the other aspect, caste. Yes, the stigma of the Indian society that tied a person's fortunes to the family he was born in, that dictated the course of his/her life. One would think that India should abolish caste distinctions completely, but I'm ashamed to state that the government of India, whose job it is to grant equality to all, has decided to sharpen the boundaries that define caste. For the government of India, in all its wisdom has declared that certain castes are backward, based on their history of exploitation for the past thousand years. The government has decided that the right to equality can be granted only by granting certain privileges to the so-called "backward classes." It has made a list of castes and tribes which are backward, and has decided to reserve some seats, in education as well as in jobs for people belonging to these castes and tribes. Not content with this list of people (perhaps they did not make up more than half the population for a landslide majority), the government added a list of "Other backward classes" and decided to give them the same privileges. Of course people protested. But what do the protests of a few selfish people mean to the government of India. We have to grant the right to equality in the country, otherwise we would violate the constitution.

However, some idiot who wanted to deny this right to equality pointed out that there were many poor people who were not from these castes/tribes/classes, while there were rich people from the backward tribes/castes/classes. So, the Supreme Court of the country, in its folly, decided to exclude the so called "creamy layer" from getting seats reserved for them. The argument of the court was that these people were not backward, or something to that effect. However, the court set a ridiculously low limit on the annual salary to define the creamy layer. It set the limit slightly higher than the average annual salary of a graduate student, and way above the definition of the poverty line in India. Ridiculous, isn't it? Clearly many more people earning much more have been denied their right to equality to come up to the level of people from the so called "upper castes" who are living lavishly by sweeping the streets. So, the government has decided to double the line defining the creamy layer. The right to equality should be granted. (Remember Boxer from "Animal Farm" with his Napoleon is always right thingy?)

At the same time, people are feeling left out of the lists of backward castes/classes/tribes. So, they have resorted to sitting on railway tracks, stopping trains for weeks, to coerce the government to list them as backward. Surprisingly, this definition of backward hardly entitles them to primary or secondary education, but kicks in only when they decide to get into undergraduate school, and when they apply for jobs. Who cares about primary education. We don't need schools, we just need people to graduate from the IITs.

Yet, even as I write, the poverty line is being shifted lower and lower, at least from the point of view of the cost of living index. The number of poor in India are being decreased, and progress is on the way, for the world to see. But the world does not recognise the line marking the "creamy layer", hence we have no qualms about increasing that line to declare more and more people as "backward."

Progress is here for sure.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Harry Potter and why I dislike the series

There could not be a better time for this post. There could not have been a worse time for this post. Now that the penultimate movie of the series is out, and my facebook wall filled with people who loved the movie. But this is something I really wanted to say, and I shall say it anyway. Harry Potter is pathetic literature. Now, you must be wondering why I say that. There are many reasons. Firstly, the storyline itself is flawed. When a writer sits down to write anything, he/she must set up some essential rules about what is happening. These rules must remain constant irrespective of how many times he/she changes his/her mind. This is so that the readers are allowed to have some sensibility in what they are reading. In the fourth book, Rowling goes ahead and kills Cedric. Then, at the end of the book, the horseless carriages are there again. Nothing special. We all knew that they are horseless. But then comes the fifth book, and BAM, the horses are actually winged beasts that only thos...

On the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard

This is a post that I have been meaning to write from quite some time. Long hours spent typing code on my computer left my hands fatigued, and left me with a lot of pain in my wrists and fingers. That is when I decided to use the Dvorak. But I have got the same bad habit as Dr. Watson, to tell a story backwards. Of course, you must be wondering what the Dvorak is. The story of keyboards starts with the invention of the typewriter. Christopher Sholes, the inventor of the typewriter, tried with a two row piano style keyboard. But then, he got into many difficulties with the design. Then he finally settled for a four row design. This was similar to the QWERTY layout that most computers and typewriters today possess. The engineers at Remington, to whom Sholes had presented his design modified the layout a little further, and then the QWERTY was born. As typewriters became popular, people got used to the layout, and started practising touch typing, i.e. typing without looking at the keys...

The paradox of government

I'm fascinated by the concept of government, and the paradoxes it presents. On one hand, governments grant us a certain set of rights or liberties. On the other hand, they work to strip us of the very liberties they promise. Now, I don't mean that all governments strip people of liberties, but there are liberal regimes, and there are sufficiently restrictive and dictatorial ones. Both models may have results to show, it does not mean that people in a restrictive regime are unhappy (refer to Dan Dennett's TED talk , where he states that ideas or memes can be dangerous when taken from one part of the world, where they are widespread, and, using the virus analogy, where people are immune to the memes; to a part of the world where they are foreign, where people may not be immune to the memes and where people may get infected). History has shown that people were sufficiently satisfied with autocratic governments with a benevolent dictator, and that people in other parts of the ...