Skip to main content

It happens only in India: We struggle to remain "backward"

This is a post I have been wanting to write for the past six years, but have finally decided to shed inhibitions and write it now. Shed inhibitions? Be warned, this post is not politically correct; I have never strived to be politically correct, though I always wish to be morally correct.

Politics in India is dirty. There is no going around the fact. When given a choice to vote, I find myself between a rock and a hard place. None of the manifestos appeal to me. Some political party, which I shall not name, had in its manifesto declared that it shall ban computers from India. How can I, an educated person, and an aspiring engineer ever stand such blasphemy? No computers! Say goodbye to all transport, elevators, microwave ovens, mobile phones, and everything else associated with the past half-century, 'cause all of them rely on microprocessors, or as the layman calls, computers. Yet, in a country with a population over a billion, housing over a seventh of the world's population, such sentiment appeals to the millions who are without jobs. Instead of trying to improve, these people prefer to lay in utter dejection, blaming the government, blaming technology, blaming the rich, blaming the world for the fact that they are jobless. Appeal to their sentiments, and votes are guaranteed. If we cannot make the poor rich, at least make the rich poor. That's the logic that goes on.

Yet, it is not this prolific struggle to remain economically and technologically backward that troubles me the greatest. It does trouble me greatly, but not the most. What troubles me is the other aspect, caste. Yes, the stigma of the Indian society that tied a person's fortunes to the family he was born in, that dictated the course of his/her life. One would think that India should abolish caste distinctions completely, but I'm ashamed to state that the government of India, whose job it is to grant equality to all, has decided to sharpen the boundaries that define caste. For the government of India, in all its wisdom has declared that certain castes are backward, based on their history of exploitation for the past thousand years. The government has decided that the right to equality can be granted only by granting certain privileges to the so-called "backward classes." It has made a list of castes and tribes which are backward, and has decided to reserve some seats, in education as well as in jobs for people belonging to these castes and tribes. Not content with this list of people (perhaps they did not make up more than half the population for a landslide majority), the government added a list of "Other backward classes" and decided to give them the same privileges. Of course people protested. But what do the protests of a few selfish people mean to the government of India. We have to grant the right to equality in the country, otherwise we would violate the constitution.

However, some idiot who wanted to deny this right to equality pointed out that there were many poor people who were not from these castes/tribes/classes, while there were rich people from the backward tribes/castes/classes. So, the Supreme Court of the country, in its folly, decided to exclude the so called "creamy layer" from getting seats reserved for them. The argument of the court was that these people were not backward, or something to that effect. However, the court set a ridiculously low limit on the annual salary to define the creamy layer. It set the limit slightly higher than the average annual salary of a graduate student, and way above the definition of the poverty line in India. Ridiculous, isn't it? Clearly many more people earning much more have been denied their right to equality to come up to the level of people from the so called "upper castes" who are living lavishly by sweeping the streets. So, the government has decided to double the line defining the creamy layer. The right to equality should be granted. (Remember Boxer from "Animal Farm" with his Napoleon is always right thingy?)

At the same time, people are feeling left out of the lists of backward castes/classes/tribes. So, they have resorted to sitting on railway tracks, stopping trains for weeks, to coerce the government to list them as backward. Surprisingly, this definition of backward hardly entitles them to primary or secondary education, but kicks in only when they decide to get into undergraduate school, and when they apply for jobs. Who cares about primary education. We don't need schools, we just need people to graduate from the IITs.

Yet, even as I write, the poverty line is being shifted lower and lower, at least from the point of view of the cost of living index. The number of poor in India are being decreased, and progress is on the way, for the world to see. But the world does not recognise the line marking the "creamy layer", hence we have no qualms about increasing that line to declare more and more people as "backward."

Progress is here for sure.

Popular posts from this blog

Progressive Snapshot: Is it worth it?

I turned 25 last year, which in the highly mathematical and calculating eyes of the US insurance industry meant that I had suddenly matured into a much more responsible driver than I was at 24 years and 364 days of age. As a result, I expected my insurance rates to go down. Imagine my surprise when my insurance renewal notice from GEICO actually quoted a $50 increase in my insurance rates. To me, this was a clear signal that it was time to switch companies.Typically, I score really high on brand loyalty. I tend to stick with a brand for as long as possible, unless they really mess up. This qualified as a major mess up. As a result, I started shopping for insurance quotes.Two companies that quoted me significantly lower rates (30%–40% lower) were Progressive and Allstate. Both had an optional programme that could give me further discounts based on my consenting to the companies tracking my driving habits. Now, I am a careful driver – I hardly ever accelerate hard. I hate using the brak…

Cornell Graduate Students United: At What Cost?

On Monday and Tuesday, we graduate students at Cornell will be voting on whether or not we want to unionise. Actually, scratch that, only graduate students who hold a TA, RA, or GRA appointment can unionise.This is a shitty arrangement, and I will be voting against it.For those of you who are not aware of how graduate school works at Cornell, you could be on one of many appointments.FellowshipA graduate student on a fellowship gets a stipend and tuition paid without associated teaching or research opportunities. Graduate students on a fellowship typically work towards their own theses, but will be excluded from the unionGraduate research assistantshipsA GRA gives a graduate student stipend and tuition without teaching responsibilities. However, this money comes out of a specific project grant, and the students typically work on their own theses. Students on GRAs magically qualify to join the union, whereas there is virtually no difference between a GRA and a fellowship for the most pa…

Reading List, April 2017

Adam Carroll, When money isn’t real: The $10,000 experiment, in TEDxLondonBusinessSchool, 9 July 2015. [Online]: Carroll presents an interesting point – we have abstracted away money through the use of a number of instruments, such as credit and debit cards, NFC payment systems on our phones, and in-app purchases, when we don’t realise how much we are actually spending. Carroll spends some time showing how his kids, aged 7–11 played monopoly differently when they were playing with real money. He goes on to lay his premise, that financial literacy must be taught to children at a young age, when they should be allowed to fail and learn from their failures at a small scale, not at the hundreds of thousands of dollars when they are in student loan debt and just out of college.Carroll’s talk hit a lot of notes with my own experiences with money, and I’m sure that it would resonate with your experiences as well.Brett Scott, If plastic replaces cash, much tha…