Skip to main content

Ah Mark Shuttleworth, You Never Fail to Disappoint

A post after a long time. Not really because I was busy, but because I am lazy, and tired having to relive my frustrations by writing on this blog.

No Mom, I am not really frustrated, that is just a funny way of writing this blog!

But it is hard to be completely happy when you have a Narwhal taking up 20 odd GB of space on your laptop.

I am sure that by the time this post would be published, I would have lost a lot of friends on facebook, those who appreciate and like Ubuntu.

Note to self: One line paragraphs are not fun enough... loads of the <p> and the </p> tags.

But I digress... coming back to the person I want to bash today... Mark Shuttleworth, a South African entrepreneur and a person so insanely rich, that he has funded his own space trip, making him Shuttle-worth-y. Unfortunately, it is through his benevolence that we are blessed (?) with the Ubuntu Operating System.

Firstly, the reasons I use(d) Ubuntu

  • Back in 2007, when I first fired up Linux, Ubuntu was user friendly, and I liked the GNOME interface.
  • I am not a fanatic like Richard Stallman all for freedom. Like Linus Torvalds, I like software that does the job. Ubuntu was far better at this than Fedora
  • It used up much less battery on my laptop, making it the choice when I was away from my trusted wall socket
  • Power-up and power-down times are decent
  • It used to be fast and stable
  • Hardware support gave a few hiccups, but it was possible to find hacks on the forums to fix any such issues
  • I cannot appreciate anything without taking it apart. I want to feel that I use the software on my computer, and am not merely another dull input for the computer (This ideology of programmers and engineers would prove to be fatal many times 30000 feet in the sky, but that is another post
  • I need some Linux specific applications, like SSH and the X server

I now go on to show how Mark Shuttleworth took away many of the reasons I use(d) Ubuntu.

Karmic Koala was by far the best distribution I have used. It solved most of the hardware issues I had with my laptop, and had a very stable kernel and a window manager (GNOME). I had many expectations for Lucid Lynx, as I believed that Ubuntu was simply getting better. But I was disappointed. It seemed as though the team, on Shuttleworth's guidance had decided to make it an operating system to woo away the average windows user. Bad choice. I don't think that Canonical can ever compete with Microsoft, which has over 30 years of making software. What I noticed was that every release of Ubuntu over the past year has tried a completely wrong approach to solving bug #1 in Ubuntu, filed by Mark Shuttleworth himself.

Confused? Let me tell you how and why the approach is wrong.

Let's face it, all of us, who have used computers for long have some dislike with Windows, mainly because of the Vista fiasco. (Not to say that Vista is that bad an OS, I have been using Vista for the past 3 years and counting.) What happened was virtually a PR disaster with the way Vista was handled. Similar to the famous "You're holding it the wrong way" disaster of the iPhone4, MS decided to blame the users for the poor reviews. They spent huge amounts of money on ad campaigns that told the users that they were stupid to believe that Vista was all that bad, get your facts right, they said.

No one likes to be told that they are stupid, the plans backfired, and MS released a different looking version called Windows 7.

But are we any happier with Windows 7 than with Windows Vista? My college is part of MSDNAA, and hence, I was lucky enough to be able to try Windows 7. My personal experience was that Windows 7 ran slower on my computer than Windows Vista, when I had all programmes and drivers loaded. Also, I lost out on the bundled software that came installed with my laptop when I purchased it. Result, I was back to Windows Vista in less than a month.

But this post is not about my experiments with Windows. Rather, it is, or should be about the things I would expect from Ubuntu, or any other OS for the OS to catch my fancy.

Well, I suppose the major issue with all of today's operating systems is that they have origins in computing 30 years ago. At that time, software came on little disks, and no one had ever thought of having terabytes of storage. As a result, we had tiny files in tiny directories leading to a tree like structure in all file storage systems. Is a tree the best way to store data? Can we do better? Don't GMail labels look much better than the folders from email clients from yesteryear?

What happens when you have many tiny files? How should a file system handle such a situation?

Are we bound to the operating systems from yesteryear? Can we not have better operating system ideologies that take into account our changing uses, and which adapt to the same in an effective manner?

These apparently are not concerns enough to the designers of the operating systems for the computers that we all depend upon. Instead, all they bother about is eye candy, and try to sell hopeless systems with a lot of make-up to the users. Ubuntu too has unfortunately chosen that path to solve bug#1. However, they have done the most shoddy job ever, and the result is an OS that changes faster than fashion. Using the new Unity interface is, to say the least, a less pleasant job than taking out the garbage. The window manager crashes every now and then, causing me to lose work the same way if I had pressed Ctrl+Alt+backspace. Only, I don't press the said key combination, rather it is done in the weirdly wired electronic brain of my computer. Unity at best has a quality comparable to an alpha release, and I have no idea how or why was it made the default window manager in Natty Narwhal.

Power consumption in Ubuntu far exceeds the consumption in Windows Vista. On Ubuntu, my laptop battery lasts for only half the time it lasts on Vista. I think this is a bug with the latest Linux kernel though, and not an issue with Ubuntu as such.

Ubuntu has taken away all the openness that is associated with Linux. Instead, hacking Ubuntu for common fixes has become as difficult as changing the behaviour of MS Windows.

I'm bored.

Popular posts from this blog

Progressive Snapshot: Is it worth it?

I turned 25 last year, which in the highly mathematical and calculating eyes of the US insurance industry meant that I had suddenly matured into a much more responsible driver than I was at 24 years and 364 days of age. As a result, I expected my insurance rates to go down. Imagine my surprise when my insurance renewal notice from GEICO actually quoted a $50 increase in my insurance rates. To me, this was a clear signal that it was time to switch companies.Typically, I score really high on brand loyalty. I tend to stick with a brand for as long as possible, unless they really mess up. This qualified as a major mess up. As a result, I started shopping for insurance quotes.Two companies that quoted me significantly lower rates (30%–40% lower) were Progressive and Allstate. Both had an optional programme that could give me further discounts based on my consenting to the companies tracking my driving habits. Now, I am a careful driver – I hardly ever accelerate hard. I hate using the brak…

Cornell Graduate Students United: At What Cost?

On Monday and Tuesday, we graduate students at Cornell will be voting on whether or not we want to unionise. Actually, scratch that, only graduate students who hold a TA, RA, or GRA appointment can unionise.This is a shitty arrangement, and I will be voting against it.For those of you who are not aware of how graduate school works at Cornell, you could be on one of many appointments.FellowshipA graduate student on a fellowship gets a stipend and tuition paid without associated teaching or research opportunities. Graduate students on a fellowship typically work towards their own theses, but will be excluded from the unionGraduate research assistantshipsA GRA gives a graduate student stipend and tuition without teaching responsibilities. However, this money comes out of a specific project grant, and the students typically work on their own theses. Students on GRAs magically qualify to join the union, whereas there is virtually no difference between a GRA and a fellowship for the most pa…

Reading List, April 2017

Adam Carroll, When money isn’t real: The $10,000 experiment, in TEDxLondonBusinessSchool, 9 July 2015. [Online]: Carroll presents an interesting point – we have abstracted away money through the use of a number of instruments, such as credit and debit cards, NFC payment systems on our phones, and in-app purchases, when we don’t realise how much we are actually spending. Carroll spends some time showing how his kids, aged 7–11 played monopoly differently when they were playing with real money. He goes on to lay his premise, that financial literacy must be taught to children at a young age, when they should be allowed to fail and learn from their failures at a small scale, not at the hundreds of thousands of dollars when they are in student loan debt and just out of college.Carroll’s talk hit a lot of notes with my own experiences with money, and I’m sure that it would resonate with your experiences as well.Brett Scott, If plastic replaces cash, much tha…