Skip to main content

Someone to Guide You: For Better or For Worse?

We were trying this out on an Arduino, but we found its computational capacity less, so we switched to an ARM, said a friend of mine who is studying in BITS Goa. In our college, only the most daring would use an ARM. The ones who do are accused of overkill. Most people use AVR, and would not look beyond AVR. What could be the reason?

I believe that a major reason is that we have seniors who have used AVR. Because they knew AVR, they held coding sessions for AVR, which is why we have not bothered to look beyond AVR. Now, this is not so much of an issue as when there is a shortage of AVRs, as there is now. When an AtMega8 costs Rs. 300, i.e. $6 in the retail market, then we have an issue. Not only that, but we also have to be content with the lesser capabilities of the AVR.

This is just to illustrate an important point: is it better or worse to have someone to guide you?

I guess that the example that I stated just goes to show that it really isn't all that good to have someone to guide you. But then, what about the guides who help you academically and with your research projects?

I am ambivalent on having a guide. As long as I do not blindly follow the guide, I am sure to be safe. If I rely too much on my guide, then I am in trouble. I guess that this is very important in research institutes. The goal should be to approach the guide as less as possible.

Is this the reason for the poor research in India? That most students through laziness or sycophancy rely too much on their guides? I think that it may be a major factor if the guide does not evolve as fast as technology does.

Colleges aside, there is an example of where blind faith in a guide can have the most devastating consequences. I am referring to my country's economic policy before 1991. Since independence, my country has largely been ruled by just one party. Nehru was schooled in Fabian socialism. He believed in a socialist state, and heavily regulated industry to keep it under government control. As a result, the industry was crippled. However, even when it was clear that socialism was not the way forward, the party in power, their eyes on the guiding light of socialism could not see the abyss that the light was leading them into. They responded with all the wrong measures like a 100% tax and a monopolies restriction act that killed all incentive to expand.

Of course the mistake was corrected by the same party when they were in power in 1991. But I am surprised that they quickly withdrew from their agenda when the crisis seemed under control. I am indeed shocked that with such a huge trump up their sleeve, there is hardly a mention of development or the change that should be the key point on the manifesto of any government hopeful. People like change for the better, they like development. While banning computers may seem a good election point, people will resent it when computers disappear, not only from office desks, but also from our cars, trains, elevators, phones, airplanes and our lives.

When I first thought of this post, I wanted to name it Are we allergic to change? But then I thought that we really are not allergic to change. We do see that people want to better their lives and betterment is change. We are not really allergic to change. However, there is a small myopic group within us that resents change, and looks at short time gain. But if the recent election results are any indicator, I hope that people will eventually vote the myopics out of power and instead vote for those with key development agendas in their manifestos.

India has greatly missed out on the industrial revolution. Let us not miss the information revolution. Let us grow with the right attitude.

Popular posts from this blog

Progressive Snapshot: Is it worth it?

I turned 25 last year, which in the highly mathematical and calculating eyes of the US insurance industry meant that I had suddenly matured into a much more responsible driver than I was at 24 years and 364 days of age. As a result, I expected my insurance rates to go down. Imagine my surprise when my insurance renewal notice from GEICO actually quoted a $50 increase in my insurance rates. To me, this was a clear signal that it was time to switch companies.Typically, I score really high on brand loyalty. I tend to stick with a brand for as long as possible, unless they really mess up. This qualified as a major mess up. As a result, I started shopping for insurance quotes.Two companies that quoted me significantly lower rates (30%–40% lower) were Progressive and Allstate. Both had an optional programme that could give me further discounts based on my consenting to the companies tracking my driving habits. Now, I am a careful driver – I hardly ever accelerate hard. I hate using the brak…

Cornell Graduate Students United: At What Cost?

On Monday and Tuesday, we graduate students at Cornell will be voting on whether or not we want to unionise. Actually, scratch that, only graduate students who hold a TA, RA, or GRA appointment can unionise.This is a shitty arrangement, and I will be voting against it.For those of you who are not aware of how graduate school works at Cornell, you could be on one of many appointments.FellowshipA graduate student on a fellowship gets a stipend and tuition paid without associated teaching or research opportunities. Graduate students on a fellowship typically work towards their own theses, but will be excluded from the unionGraduate research assistantshipsA GRA gives a graduate student stipend and tuition without teaching responsibilities. However, this money comes out of a specific project grant, and the students typically work on their own theses. Students on GRAs magically qualify to join the union, whereas there is virtually no difference between a GRA and a fellowship for the most pa…

Reading List, April 2017

Adam Carroll, When money isn’t real: The $10,000 experiment, in TEDxLondonBusinessSchool, 9 July 2015. [Online]: Carroll presents an interesting point – we have abstracted away money through the use of a number of instruments, such as credit and debit cards, NFC payment systems on our phones, and in-app purchases, when we don’t realise how much we are actually spending. Carroll spends some time showing how his kids, aged 7–11 played monopoly differently when they were playing with real money. He goes on to lay his premise, that financial literacy must be taught to children at a young age, when they should be allowed to fail and learn from their failures at a small scale, not at the hundreds of thousands of dollars when they are in student loan debt and just out of college.Carroll’s talk hit a lot of notes with my own experiences with money, and I’m sure that it would resonate with your experiences as well.Brett Scott, If plastic replaces cash, much tha…