Skip to main content

Reading List, November 2017

  1. Samuel Vee, I see trad people, in Status 451, 5 November 2017. [Online]: https://status451.com/2017/11/05/i-see-trad-people/

    It seems that more and more, I’m sharing articles that would be frowned upon by the mainstream. I see this as a way to break some of the bubbles that are a part of life in a left-leaning college town. In this article, Samuel Vee cites theories by Haidt and Graham to understand why people who identify either as progessive or conservative do things that are decidedly un-progressive or un-conservative. In doing so, Vee argues that our political leanings come in through our moral foundations, and that these are innate, therefore identifying as part of the other political ideology is akin to being in the closet.

    Vee makes another point right in the beginning of the article pointing out the social progress that we have already achieved, and mentions, rightly so, that we should view today’s moral and social issues through the lens of society fifty years ago. This reminded me of a fragment from a lecture by Haidt at Duke University, in which he raised the same point.

  2. Kashmir Hill, How Facebook figures out everyone you’ve ever met, in Gizmodo, 7 November 2017.

    A look inside the privacy nightmare known as Facebook. This article describes how Facebook generates a shadow profile on each person in the world, not just from information that you’ve shared, but from information that other people share about you. This is crazy, because anyone’s op-sec is now the minimum of the op-sec of the worst offender in their network. Ever shared your phone number or made a call to someone who decides to share this information from their smartphone to Facebook? Facebook knows that you’ve spoken. Ever written an email to a business contact who has a bad smartphone policy? Facebook will suggest that the two of you connect.

    Simply deleting my Facebook account is not an option either, as this data collection will go on even if I don’t have a Facebook account.

  3. Eric S. Raymond, The long goodbye to C, in Armed and Dangerous, 7 November 2017. [Online]: http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=7711

    The old fart thinks that it is time to let C go. ESR mentions that he hasn’t started a new project in C for quite a while now, and with contenders like Python, Go, and Rust, the need to write new code in C is largely irrelevant.

    What I’d like to hear is why C++ is never considered as a serious contender. C++, especially the newer standards like C++11 and C++17 have evolved to be mature and modern standards that could easily give Go a run for its money. Anyway, it will be interesting to see how languages evolve in the next few years.

  4. Alice Gregory, The sorrow and shame of the accidental killer, 18 September 2017. [Online]: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/09/18/the-sorrow-and-the-shame-of-the-accidental-killer

    Thanks to Nishant for sharing this article. This story talks about the horror, shame, and sorrow of accidentally causing injury or death to another human being. In the case of an accident, we are too quick to blame and find someone responsible, but we never see the person who walks away as a victim.

    I went and listened to the ‘All Things Considered’ episode referenced in the article. In this episode, Maryann Gray reads a statement about causing the accidental death of an eight year old, and how she lives with that knowledge every day.

  5. Esther Inglis-Arkell, How an unpaid UK researcher saved the Japanese seaweed industry, in Ars Technica, 19 November 2017. [Online]: https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/11/how-an-unpaid-uk-researcher-saved-the-japanese-seaweed-industry/

    A fascinating story of how a researcher, fired from her university due to a policy of not hiring married women, discovered the secret Clark Kent and Superman relationship between seaweed and a pink sludge, leading to the commercial farming of seaweed.

  6. Arnab Ray, On Padmavati and selective outrage, in Random Thoughts of a Demented Mind, 20 November 2017. [Online]: https://greatbong.net/2017/11/20/on-padmavati-and-selective-outrage/

    Arnab points out the hypocrisy of the self-proclaimed Indian liberals, and points out that the behaviour of liberals is actually pretty fundamentalist-adjacent. Sure, liberals don’t call for physical harm, but social shaming and ostracisation play the same role in shutting down inconvenient speech.

  7. Kristina Panos, Joan Feynman found her place in the sun, in Hack A Day, 22 November 2017. [Online]: http://hackaday.com/2017/11/21/joan-feynman-found-her-place-in-the-sun/

    A look at Richard Feynman’s little sister, herself a physicist researching coronal mass ejections at NASA’s JPL. I must confess, I hadn’t even heard of Joan Feynman until I read this article.

  8. Brian Benchoff, Marguerite Perey: when the lab assistant gets the credit, in Hack A day, 28 November 2017. [Online]: https://hackaday.com/2017/11/28/marguerite-perey-when-the-lab-assistant-gets-the-credit/

    A story of the discovery of francium by Marguerite Perey, lab assistant at the Curie Institute. After her discovery of francium, she went on to get a bachelor’s degree and then a PhD from the Sorbonne, and was the first woman elected to the French Academy of Sciences.

  9. Ronald Minnich, Replace your exploit-ridden firmware with Linux, in The Linux Foundation’s Youtube channel, 27 October 2017. [Online]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iffTJ1vPCSo

    Turns out that every Intel microprocessor has Minix3 running inside the management-engine, the stuff of security nightmares. In this talk, Minnich discusses how they managed to de-fang the management engine, remove all the old, legacy, and buggy firmware, and replace it with a Linux kernel with a userspace written in Go. This project, called NERF, or non-extensible reduced firmware, apparently also helps reduce the boot time by orders of magnitude, although I must say that I don’t necessarily understand why servers take eight minutes to boot up.

  10. Andrew V. Suarez and Terry McGlynn, The fallacy of open-access publication, in The Chronicle of Higher Education, 15 November 2017. [Online]: http://www.chronicle.com/article/the-fallacy-of-open-access/241786

    Academic publishing is broken. Journals cost a lot of money, either to access or to publish, and sometimes for both. This is terrible news for the public, as they cannot access the results of scientific research paid for with their tax dollars. Open-access, or the philosophy that journals should be free to access is often touted as a solution, but has a downside that authors are now required to pay for publishing their work. In this article, the authors state that open-access does not solve the problems in the academic industry, and that open-access journals, motivated by a profit, could actually publish bad science. In my opinion, though, this article is written in a way that makes an open-access strawman, and reads like a propaganda piece for the old order, where colleges have to pay tens of thousands of dollars to get access to journals. Sharing so that you may form your own opinions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Harry Potter and why I dislike the series

There could not be a better time for this post. There could not have been a worse time for this post. Now that the penultimate movie of the series is out, and my facebook wall filled with people who loved the movie. But this is something I really wanted to say, and I shall say it anyway. Harry Potter is pathetic literature. Now, you must be wondering why I say that. There are many reasons. Firstly, the storyline itself is flawed. When a writer sits down to write anything, he/she must set up some essential rules about what is happening. These rules must remain constant irrespective of how many times he/she changes his/her mind. This is so that the readers are allowed to have some sensibility in what they are reading. In the fourth book, Rowling goes ahead and kills Cedric. Then, at the end of the book, the horseless carriages are there again. Nothing special. We all knew that they are horseless. But then comes the fifth book, and BAM, the horses are actually winged beasts that only thos

ERROR_SUCCESS

ERROR_SUCCESS. This macro would be familiar to all those who have done some programming in WIN32. It is the output of the GetLastError() function to check the thread's last error state when no error has occurred. Weird, isn't it? I mean, if it is a success, then why is it marked as an error in the macro? This is one example of a badly made API. APIs are considered bad when programming in them becomes non-intuitive. Software is said to be bad (or said to suck) when it seems counter-intuitive to the user. There is one very simple example of this. Start notepad. Type in any text. Click on close. The message that you see is: This makes no sense to me as a user. Of course, the programmer follows the approach that he creates a temporary file called Untitled , and in that file he allows the user to make all his changes. But how am I, as a user to understand that? A similar disconnect occurs even between two different programmers. That is why it takes a whole lot of effort to make

Elements of a Story: The Whispers

I'm compelled to begin each post with a meta. That way, my blog posts seem less like essays or dissertations, and more like diary entries, or web logs. So here goes... I started this blog a little over a year ago. The main purpose of this blog was to experiment with styles of writing, and find an effective outlet for all the subjects I wish to rant about; saving my classmates the agony of having to listen to them. As I wrote this blog, I've experimented with so many styles, and have received comments claiming that my work is a shameless copy greatly inspired by so-and-so author/work. Fact is that I simply chanced upon that style. I read, so obviously, my work shall reflect the styles of those I admire, but I've worked out so many styles without even knowing that they exist, only to be informed of them later. Recently, I've been struck with the seeming absence of whispers as an element of a story. The more I've thought of the subject, the more I've been convince